BOO! YOU'VE BEEN GHOSTED: EXPLORING THE SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY OF GHOSTING BEHAVIOR

This paper explores the social acceptability of ghosting, a common but often criticized relationship dissolution strategy, within the context of college students' experiences. The study investigates how gender and key character traits influence perceptions of ghosting compared to other breakup methods, such as direct communication and de-escalation. The results show that students generally view honest and respectful breakup strategies, such as openly discussing reasons for the breakup, as the most socially acceptable. Ghosting—especially in relationships that are less intimate or short-lived—is seen as sometimes acceptable, particularly when someone feels unsafe or lacks the interpersonal skills to confront their partner directly. Gender differences were notable: men were more likely to view ghosting as acceptable. Women, in contrast, preferred more direct forms of breakup communication. Character traits also played a role in students' perceptions of ghosting. Those who valued honesty tended to reject ghosting as an acceptable method of relationship termination, while students who prioritized kindness were somewhat more lenient toward indirect breakup tactics, such as minimizing contact or giving vague explanations. The study highlights the complexity of ghosting behavior, emphasizing the influence of gender, personal values, and relationship context on its social acceptability. The paper suggests that future research should explore how attachment styles and personality traits further shape individuals' choices in relationship dissolution.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15376388
Primary Topic
Immune Response and Inflammation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BOO! YOU'VE BEEN GHOSTED: EXPLORING THE SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY OF GHOSTING BEHAVIOR

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Immune Response and Inflammation
article

BOO! YOU'VE BEEN GHOSTED: EXPLORING THE SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY OF GHOSTING BEHAVIOR

article en

Abstract

This paper explores the social acceptability of ghosting, a common but often criticized relationship dissolution strategy, within the context of college students' experiences. The study investigates how gender and key character traits influence perceptions of ghosting compared to other breakup methods, such as direct communication and de-escalation. The results show that students generally view honest and respectful breakup strategies, such as openly discussing reasons for the breakup, as the most socially acceptable. Ghosting—especially in relationships that are less intimate or short-lived—is seen as sometimes acceptable, particularly when someone feels unsafe or lacks the interpersonal skills to confront their partner directly. Gender differences were notable: men were more likely to view ghosting as acceptable. Women, in contrast, preferred more direct forms of breakup communication. Character traits also played a role in students' perceptions of ghosting. Those who valued honesty tended to reject ghosting as an acceptable method of relationship termination, while students who prioritized kindness were somewhat more lenient toward indirect breakup tactics, such as minimizing contact or giving vague explanations. The study highlights the complexity of ghosting behavior, emphasizing the influence of gender, personal values, and relationship context on its social acceptability. The paper suggests that future research should explore how attachment styles and personality traits further shape individuals' choices in relationship dissolution.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Immune Response and Inflammation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.