Socialism: Errors in Theory (Soviet Political Economy of the 1960s–1970s)

The article is devoted to the contradictions of the official political economy of the era of “mature socialism”. The majority of leading political economists, reflecting the official point of view, rightly denied the coexistence of the market and socialism, which was called for by the “commodity economists”. At the same time, however, they considered the established commodity relations under "developed socialism" as formal, not posing a threat to the new system, but, on the contrary, "working" for it. This circumstance, as well as a certain conformism, is connected with the support of scientists for the deepening and expansion of relations within the framework of the "Kosygin" reform of 1965. Commodity in the Soviet economy was not regarded as a sign of incompleteness of socialist transformations; a factor of immaturity of socialism. Such a position was also connected with the Soviet political economists' lack of understanding of how planning could completely displace market elements; how to organize real alienation. Therefore, political economy thought in the USSR in the era of “developed socialism” cannot be considered adequate to the real tasks facing the country.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15072944
Primary Topic
Russia and Soviet political economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socialism: Errors in Theory (Soviet Political Economy of the 1960s–1970s)

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Russia and Soviet political economy
article

Socialism: Errors in Theory (Soviet Political Economy of the 1960s–1970s)

article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to the contradictions of the official political economy of the era of “mature socialism”. The majority of leading political economists, reflecting the official point of view, rightly denied the coexistence of the market and socialism, which was called for by the “commodity economists”. At the same time, however, they considered the established commodity relations under "developed socialism" as formal, not posing a threat to the new system, but, on the contrary, "working" for it. This circumstance, as well as a certain conformism, is connected with the support of scientists for the deepening and expansion of relations within the framework of the "Kosygin" reform of 1965. Commodity in the Soviet economy was not regarded as a sign of incompleteness of socialist transformations; a factor of immaturity of socialism. Such a position was also connected with the Soviet political economists' lack of understanding of how planning could completely displace market elements; how to organize real alienation. Therefore, political economy thought in the USSR in the era of “developed socialism” cannot be considered adequate to the real tasks facing the country.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
PLUS Foundation (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Russia and Soviet political economy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.