Parental Rights and Child Custody: Analyzing Biases against Fathers in Child Custody Battles

Child custody disputes are as contentious as any issue in family law, and some wonder if judges arebiased by gender when making determinations about child custody. Although custody laws aredesigned to reflect the disposition that best addresses the cause of any such care or monitors, criticscontend that courts demonstrate a systemic bias favoring mothers when it comes to custody decisions,leaving fathers at a disadvantage. This paper attempts to find out if such a bias against fathers existsin legal fights over child custody, evaluating legal frameworks, historical patterns, judicial precedents,and changing custody standards. The paper analyses the child custody laws in India, specifically underthe Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act of 1956, as well as the Guardians and Wards Act of 1890,along with the international custody laws practiced explicitly in the U.S., the U.K., and Canada. Itexamines traditional gender roles and the impact they have on judicial decisions, revealing howsociety's view of mothers as the primary caregivers can affect custody outcomes. Based on an analysisof case law, the paper elaborates on trends in custody decisions for both gender and the disadvantagesfathers have, such as lack of visitation rights, financial burden due to child support, and hurdles toclaiming sole custody. "While it could be argued that custody decisions are biased, it cannot be shownthat they are all that way, and in fact, the trends in the law suggest a move towards shared parents,"said Jess McEwan. The role of fathers in child development is slowly gaining recognition, as observedin the matter of Vivek Singh v. Romani Singh (2017) 3 SCC 231, where courts have begun toacknowledge the importance of fathers. The Law Commission's 257th Report (2015) also recommendsjoint custody,568, which is a legislative effort across the board. The paper ends with policyrecommendations like improving mediation mechanisms, strengthening shared parenting laws, andjudicial training to avert unconscious bias. Gender-neutral custody laws promote the best interests ofthe child and an equal opportunity for parental involvement, allowing for a marriage between therights of both parties throughout the legal process.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15283061
Primary Topic
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parental Rights and Child Custody: Analyzing Biases against Fathers in Child Custody Battles

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
article

Parental Rights and Child Custody: Analyzing Biases against Fathers in Child Custody Battles

article en

Abstract

Child custody disputes are as contentious as any issue in family law, and some wonder if judges arebiased by gender when making determinations about child custody. Although custody laws aredesigned to reflect the disposition that best addresses the cause of any such care or monitors, criticscontend that courts demonstrate a systemic bias favoring mothers when it comes to custody decisions,leaving fathers at a disadvantage. This paper attempts to find out if such a bias against fathers existsin legal fights over child custody, evaluating legal frameworks, historical patterns, judicial precedents,and changing custody standards. The paper analyses the child custody laws in India, specifically underthe Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act of 1956, as well as the Guardians and Wards Act of 1890,along with the international custody laws practiced explicitly in the U.S., the U.K., and Canada. Itexamines traditional gender roles and the impact they have on judicial decisions, revealing howsociety's view of mothers as the primary caregivers can affect custody outcomes. Based on an analysisof case law, the paper elaborates on trends in custody decisions for both gender and the disadvantagesfathers have, such as lack of visitation rights, financial burden due to child support, and hurdles toclaiming sole custody. "While it could be argued that custody decisions are biased, it cannot be shownthat they are all that way, and in fact, the trends in the law suggest a move towards shared parents,"said Jess McEwan. The role of fathers in child development is slowly gaining recognition, as observedin the matter of Vivek Singh v. Romani Singh (2017) 3 SCC 231, where courts have begun toacknowledge the importance of fathers. The Law Commission's 257th Report (2015) also recommendsjoint custody,568, which is a legislative effort across the board. The paper ends with policyrecommendations like improving mediation mechanisms, strengthening shared parenting laws, andjudicial training to avert unconscious bias. Gender-neutral custody laws promote the best interests ofthe child and an equal opportunity for parental involvement, allowing for a marriage between therights of both parties throughout the legal process.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Parental Rights and Child Custody: Analyzing Biases against Fathers in Child Custody Battles · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS