The Cross-Domain Coherence Index (CDCI): A Quantitative Framework for Unified Theory Validation Across Scientific Disciplines

The Cross-Domain Coherence Index (CDCI) is presented as a quantitative framework to evaluate theoretical models across multiple scientific disciplines for structural consistency, predictive alignment, and emergent property coherence. Unlike discipline-specific validation methods, CDCI operates by extracting the shared structural logic of a model and measuring its fit across independent domains, producing a normalized coherence score between 0 and 1. This approach allows for falsification, refinement, or reinforcement of a theory’s claim to universality. The CDCI is tested against multiple case studies from physics, biology, and cognitive science, including both high-coherence and low-coherence models, with results indicating its sensitivity to overfitting, domain misalignment, and theoretical incompleteness.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16878313
Primary Topic
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Cross-Domain Coherence Index (CDCI): A Quantitative Framework for Unified Theory Validation Across Scientific Disciplines

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
article

The Cross-Domain Coherence Index (CDCI): A Quantitative Framework for Unified Theory Validation Across Scientific Disciplines

article en

Abstract

The Cross-Domain Coherence Index (CDCI) is presented as a quantitative framework to evaluate theoretical models across multiple scientific disciplines for structural consistency, predictive alignment, and emergent property coherence. Unlike discipline-specific validation methods, CDCI operates by extracting the shared structural logic of a model and measuring its fit across independent domains, producing a normalized coherence score between 0 and 1. This approach allows for falsification, refinement, or reinforcement of a theory’s claim to universality. The CDCI is tested against multiple case studies from physics, biology, and cognitive science, including both high-coherence and low-coherence models, with results indicating its sensitivity to overfitting, domain misalignment, and theoretical incompleteness.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.