Non-Strabismic Binocular Vision Dysfunction Among Contact Lens Wearers

Purpose: To investigate the prevalence and types of non-strabismic binocular vision dysfunction (NSBVD) among contact lens wearers. Methods: Participants attended one clinical visit while wearing their habitual contact lenses. Participants were required to have a spherical myopia range between -0.50 D and -12.00 D with ≤ 0.75 D of astigmatism and at least six months of experience wearing single-vision contact lenses. A comprehensive binocular vision assessment was performed, including phoria measurements, amplitude of accommodation, near point of convergence, fusional reserves, and relative accommodation. Results: Sixty-four participants completed the trail, and 15 (23.1%) were diagnosed with NSBVDs. Convergence insufficiency was the most prevalent disorder (7.8%), followed by basic exophoria (3.1%), ill-sustained accommodation (3.1%), and accommodative excess (3.1%). Participants with NSBVDs exhibited significantly higher near exophoria (-6.7 ± 7.2Δ vs. -1.6 ± 2.2Δ, p = 0.03), receded near point of convergence (9.3 ± 3.1 cm vs. 5.5 ± 2.1 cm, p = 0.01), and reduced accommodative facility (monocular: 8.6 ± 5.8 cycles/min vs. 16.4 ± 4.3 cycles/min, p = 0.001; binocular: 4.3 ± 6.7 cycles/min vs. 13.3 ± 3.7 cycles/min, p < 0.001). Reduced fusional reserves and accommodative lag were also observed among affected participants. Conclusion: NSBVD are common among contact lens wearers and may contribute to visual discomfort, impacting contact lens tolerance and overall visual performance. Routine binocular vision assessment in contact lens practice is recommended to optimize visual outcomes and reduce contact lens discontinuation due to undiagnosed binocular vision anomalies.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-07-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15921034
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-Strabismic Binocular Vision Dysfunction Among Contact Lens Wearers

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sports Performance and Training
article

Non-Strabismic Binocular Vision Dysfunction Among Contact Lens Wearers

article en

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the prevalence and types of non-strabismic binocular vision dysfunction (NSBVD) among contact lens wearers. Methods: Participants attended one clinical visit while wearing their habitual contact lenses. Participants were required to have a spherical myopia range between -0.50 D and -12.00 D with ≤ 0.75 D of astigmatism and at least six months of experience wearing single-vision contact lenses. A comprehensive binocular vision assessment was performed, including phoria measurements, amplitude of accommodation, near point of convergence, fusional reserves, and relative accommodation. Results: Sixty-four participants completed the trail, and 15 (23.1%) were diagnosed with NSBVDs. Convergence insufficiency was the most prevalent disorder (7.8%), followed by basic exophoria (3.1%), ill-sustained accommodation (3.1%), and accommodative excess (3.1%). Participants with NSBVDs exhibited significantly higher near exophoria (-6.7 ± 7.2Δ vs. -1.6 ± 2.2Δ, p = 0.03), receded near point of convergence (9.3 ± 3.1 cm vs. 5.5 ± 2.1 cm, p = 0.01), and reduced accommodative facility (monocular: 8.6 ± 5.8 cycles/min vs. 16.4 ± 4.3 cycles/min, p = 0.001; binocular: 4.3 ± 6.7 cycles/min vs. 13.3 ± 3.7 cycles/min, p < 0.001). Reduced fusional reserves and accommodative lag were also observed among affected participants. Conclusion: NSBVD are common among contact lens wearers and may contribute to visual discomfort, impacting contact lens tolerance and overall visual performance. Routine binocular vision assessment in contact lens practice is recommended to optimize visual outcomes and reduce contact lens discontinuation due to undiagnosed binocular vision anomalies.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.