TENDENCIES OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL CRIMINAL LAW FORMAL DEFENSES RELATED TO IMMEDIATE ULTIMUM REMEDIUM

Abstract This research aims to explain Law no. 32 of 2019 concerning Environmental Protection and Management and explains the Job Creation Law no. 11 of 2020, where in enforcing environmental criminal law formal offenses are applied as an ultimum remedium. The research was conducted at the Ministry of Environment and Forestry in 2019, using normative legal research methods relating to environmental issues which were analyzed qualitatively and conclusions were drawn deductively, namely general thinking to specific matters, so that the research results were that in enforcement of environmental criminal law, law enforcement officers tend to apply the primum remedium principle, so that the environment has not been polluted and/or damaged but the perpetrator is punished with a criminal sentence, even though in fact the environment can still be repaired, therefore an ultimum remedium principle is needed. For incidents like this, it is wise to first hand over the handling to the administrative law regime. So the procedural law must be very technical which does not give rise to multiple interpretations, detailed and clear and can be implemented. This is because formal offenses related to the principle of ultimum remedium must be applied. Because almost all law enforcement officers tend not to be able to distinguish between how formal and material offenses are applied in enforcing environmental criminal law. This correlates with cases of environmental pollution and/or destruction that are referred to the Court, there is no distinction in the application of formal offenses and material offenses, as if there is no meaning in the ultimum remedium principle in the UUPPLH. The existence of the ultimum remedium principle should accumulate with formal offenses which give rise to special procedural law. Special procedural laws must be obeyed in implementing these formal offenses. If this is ignored, the process of handling environmental cases could result in being null and void.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14209403
Primary Topic
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TENDENCIES OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL CRIMINAL LAW FORMAL DEFENSES RELATED TO IMMEDIATE ULTIMUM REMEDIUM

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
article

TENDENCIES OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL CRIMINAL LAW FORMAL DEFENSES RELATED TO IMMEDIATE ULTIMUM REMEDIUM

article en

Abstract

Abstract This research aims to explain Law no. 32 of 2019 concerning Environmental Protection and Management and explains the Job Creation Law no. 11 of 2020, where in enforcing environmental criminal law formal offenses are applied as an ultimum remedium. The research was conducted at the Ministry of Environment and Forestry in 2019, using normative legal research methods relating to environmental issues which were analyzed qualitatively and conclusions were drawn deductively, namely general thinking to specific matters, so that the research results were that in enforcement of environmental criminal law, law enforcement officers tend to apply the primum remedium principle, so that the environment has not been polluted and/or damaged but the perpetrator is punished with a criminal sentence, even though in fact the environment can still be repaired, therefore an ultimum remedium principle is needed. For incidents like this, it is wise to first hand over the handling to the administrative law regime. So the procedural law must be very technical which does not give rise to multiple interpretations, detailed and clear and can be implemented. This is because formal offenses related to the principle of ultimum remedium must be applied. Because almost all law enforcement officers tend not to be able to distinguish between how formal and material offenses are applied in enforcing environmental criminal law. This correlates with cases of environmental pollution and/or destruction that are referred to the Court, there is no distinction in the application of formal offenses and material offenses, as if there is no meaning in the ultimum remedium principle in the UUPPLH. The existence of the ultimum remedium principle should accumulate with formal offenses which give rise to special procedural law. Special procedural laws must be obeyed in implementing these formal offenses. If this is ignored, the process of handling environmental cases could result in being null and void.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universitas Sumatera Utara (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

TENDENCIES OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL CRIMINAL LAW FORMAL DEFENSES RELATED TO IMMEDIATE ULTIMUM REMEDIUM · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS