SETTING ASIDE AN ARBITRAL AWARD UNDER SECTION 34, ARBITRATION & CONCILIATION ACT, 2019

Arbitration is a means of resolving disputes quickly and without much litigation. The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, along with its amendments in 2015 and 2019, provide under Section 34 the grounds for challenging arbitral awards and the procedure to do so. These grounds include incapacity of the parties, procedural unfairness, contrary to public policy, and awards outside the scope of arbitration. The challenges must be made within an extremely short time of three months, which can be extended by a further 30 days, thus ensuring swiftness. The aim of amendments is to facilitate efficiency and at the same time naturalizes judicial control, while the court should not interfere with awards simply on the grounds of factual or legal errors. Overall, the framework creates a balance between the finality related to the arbitral aspect and the other fair and due process considerations in the resolution of disputes.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15193561
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SETTING ASIDE AN ARBITRAL AWARD UNDER SECTION 34, ARBITRATION & CONCILIATION ACT, 2019

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

SETTING ASIDE AN ARBITRAL AWARD UNDER SECTION 34, ARBITRATION & CONCILIATION ACT, 2019

article en

Abstract

Arbitration is a means of resolving disputes quickly and without much litigation. The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, along with its amendments in 2015 and 2019, provide under Section 34 the grounds for challenging arbitral awards and the procedure to do so. These grounds include incapacity of the parties, procedural unfairness, contrary to public policy, and awards outside the scope of arbitration. The challenges must be made within an extremely short time of three months, which can be extended by a further 30 days, thus ensuring swiftness. The aim of amendments is to facilitate efficiency and at the same time naturalizes judicial control, while the court should not interfere with awards simply on the grounds of factual or legal errors. Overall, the framework creates a balance between the finality related to the arbitral aspect and the other fair and due process considerations in the resolution of disputes.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.