The Comparative advantage of digital and face-to-face data collection in 21st century research

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the comparative advantages of digital media and face-to-face in data collection. Methods: The researcher used the descriptive survey research design. The sample size was 330 researchers from the field of agriculture. The questionnaire was used as the instrument for data collection, and the results were presented in tables and one chart. The data for the study were analysed using percentages and mean. Result: The advantages of digital media over a face-to-face approach to data collection include the ability to collect large data, the possibility of collecting diverse data, cost-effectiveness, access to more data, timely collection of data and the possibility of tracing collected data. The advantages of face-to-face data collection include interaction with participants, direct observation, deeper probing, use of non-verbal cues, control over data collection, better data quality and supervision of the data collection process. The researcher also found that the nature of a study determines the choice of the data collection process. The factors that influence the choice of data collection include the volume of data involved, the location of participants, educational level, participants’ digital skills, availability of resources, the study's time frame and the researchers' digital skills. Conclusion: Although, digital media platforms have significantly changed the face of data collection, the face-to-face mode of data collection is also essential because it has advantages.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13992563
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Comparative advantage of digital and face-to-face data collection in 21st century research

5 citations
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
5.55
article

The Comparative advantage of digital and face-to-face data collection in 21st century research

article en
5 citations

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the comparative advantages of digital media and face-to-face in data collection. Methods: The researcher used the descriptive survey research design. The sample size was 330 researchers from the field of agriculture. The questionnaire was used as the instrument for data collection, and the results were presented in tables and one chart. The data for the study were analysed using percentages and mean. Result: The advantages of digital media over a face-to-face approach to data collection include the ability to collect large data, the possibility of collecting diverse data, cost-effectiveness, access to more data, timely collection of data and the possibility of tracing collected data. The advantages of face-to-face data collection include interaction with participants, direct observation, deeper probing, use of non-verbal cues, control over data collection, better data quality and supervision of the data collection process. The researcher also found that the nature of a study determines the choice of the data collection process. The factors that influence the choice of data collection include the volume of data involved, the location of participants, educational level, participants’ digital skills, availability of resources, the study's time frame and the researchers' digital skills. Conclusion: Although, digital media platforms have significantly changed the face of data collection, the face-to-face mode of data collection is also essential because it has advantages.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
5.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.