Euura groenlandica

326 Euura groenlandica (Malaise, 1933) Amauronematus groenlandicus Malaise, 1933: 3–4. Diagnosis Most similar to Euura obscuripes (toeniata group) and E. variator (variator group) and synonymy with one of these species cannot be excluded. Except for its mostly black femora, the colouration of the holotype of groenlandicus is most similar to Euura obscuripes specimens DEI-GISHym19806 (Abisko, Torne Lappmark, Sweden) and DEI-GISHym84010 (Finnmark, Norway). Similarly to DEI-GISHym19806 (but not DEI-GISHym84010), the thorax of the holotype is noticeably wider than the head in dorsal view, which we have not observed in E. variator (as wide as head or only slightly wider). Malar space is about 2.3–2.5 times as long as diameter of front ocellus (1.9–2.1 times in DEI-GISHym84010), which is as in the opacipleuris group, but the shape of sawsheath does not fit this group. Based on the shape of serrulae and length of setae (rather short), the lancet (only tip visible in the holotype) seems to be most similar to some specimens of E. obscuripes (DEI-GISHym19904, DEI-GISHym12101: the other checked E. obscuripes specimens have longer setae). Although, overall, the holotype of groenlandicus seems to fit best with E. obscuripes, the combination of mostly black femora, extensively pale head and thorax, and long malar space suggest that it may be a different species. Sequencing of nuclear genes might be required to decide more confidently on the status of E. groenlandica and its group affinity. In the absence of unequivocally determined specimens, we remove Euura groenlandica from the list of Palaearctic taxa. Benson (1962) did not examine the holotype of groenlandicus and based his concept of the species on specimens from Greenland that were compared with the holotype. Apparently, the specimens were mostly black, because Benson (1962) found them to be very similar to E. hyperborea, while the groenlandicus type is extensively pale. Benson (1962) synonymised carbonarius with groenlandicus, but we consider carbonarius to be a synonym of E. obscuripes. Therefore, the European records of E. groenlandica by Benson (1962) and Lindqvist (1959d; under the name Amauronematus carbonarius) might refer to E. obscuripes or some other similar Euura. Type material examined Holotype Amauronematus groenlandicus GREENLAND – Wollaston Forland • ♀; Landingsdalen; 74.47° N, 19.13° W; 28 Jul. 1929; Knaben leg.; ZMUN. Host plants Not definitely known. Smith (1979) wrote “ Salix (?)”. Genetics COI No data. Nuclear No data. Distribution and material examined Nearctic. Only one specimen studied, from Greenland.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15021255
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Euura groenlandica

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Euura groenlandica

article en

Abstract

326 Euura groenlandica (Malaise, 1933) Amauronematus groenlandicus Malaise, 1933: 3–4. Diagnosis Most similar to Euura obscuripes (toeniata group) and E. variator (variator group) and synonymy with one of these species cannot be excluded. Except for its mostly black femora, the colouration of the holotype of groenlandicus is most similar to Euura obscuripes specimens DEI-GISHym19806 (Abisko, Torne Lappmark, Sweden) and DEI-GISHym84010 (Finnmark, Norway). Similarly to DEI-GISHym19806 (but not DEI-GISHym84010), the thorax of the holotype is noticeably wider than the head in dorsal view, which we have not observed in E. variator (as wide as head or only slightly wider). Malar space is about 2.3–2.5 times as long as diameter of front ocellus (1.9–2.1 times in DEI-GISHym84010), which is as in the opacipleuris group, but the shape of sawsheath does not fit this group. Based on the shape of serrulae and length of setae (rather short), the lancet (only tip visible in the holotype) seems to be most similar to some specimens of E. obscuripes (DEI-GISHym19904, DEI-GISHym12101: the other checked E. obscuripes specimens have longer setae). Although, overall, the holotype of groenlandicus seems to fit best with E. obscuripes, the combination of mostly black femora, extensively pale head and thorax, and long malar space suggest that it may be a different species. Sequencing of nuclear genes might be required to decide more confidently on the status of E. groenlandica and its group affinity. In the absence of unequivocally determined specimens, we remove Euura groenlandica from the list of Palaearctic taxa. Benson (1962) did not examine the holotype of groenlandicus and based his concept of the species on specimens from Greenland that were compared with the holotype. Apparently, the specimens were mostly black, because Benson (1962) found them to be very similar to E. hyperborea, while the groenlandicus type is extensively pale. Benson (1962) synonymised carbonarius with groenlandicus, but we consider carbonarius to be a synonym of E. obscuripes. Therefore, the European records of E. groenlandica by Benson (1962) and Lindqvist (1959d; under the name Amauronematus carbonarius) might refer to E. obscuripes or some other similar Euura. Type material examined Holotype Amauronematus groenlandicus GREENLAND – Wollaston Forland • ♀; Landingsdalen; 74.47° N, 19.13° W; 28 Jul. 1929; Knaben leg.; ZMUN. Host plants Not definitely known. Smith (1979) wrote “ Salix (?)”. Genetics COI No data. Nuclear No data. Distribution and material examined Nearctic. Only one specimen studied, from Greenland.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (DE), Senckenberg German Entomological Institute (DE)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.