Herpetacarus (Abonnencia) longispinus

Herpetacarus (Abonnencia) longispinus (Radford, 1948) (Figs. 5A, B, 6) Ascoschoengastia longispina Radford, 1948: 219, figs. 13–14. Euschoengastia longispina: Wharton & Fuller 1952: 78; Zumpt 1961: 162. Herpetacarus (Abonnencia) longispina: Vercammen-Grandjean 1965b: 87; 1966: 643, pl. O, 3. Herpetacarus (Abonnencia) longispinus: Stekolnikov 2018: 61. Ascoschoengastia rhabdomyia Lawrence, 1951a: 116, fig. 16, c, syn. nov. Euschoengastia rhabdomyia: Wharton & Fuller 1952: 81; Zumpt 1961: 162. Herpetacarus (Herpetacarus) rhabdomys: Vercammen-Grandjean 1965b: 86; Stekolnikov 2018: 68. Herpetacarus (Herpetacarus) rhabdomiya: Vercammen-Grandjean 1966: 640, pl. F, 5. Diagnosis. SIF = 7B-N-3-2111.1100; fPp = B/B/NNB; PL ≥ AL >> AM; fD = 2H-8-6-6-6+(2–8); DS = 30–34; V = 21–24; NDV = 53–55; scutum telostigmal, with bow-shaped posterior margin; sensilla subglobose; sensillary bases anterior to level of PLs; Ip = 731–820. Standard measurements are given in Table 3. Redescription (holotype and 1 topotypic specimen of H. longispinus and 8 non-type specimens of A. rhabdomyia). IDIOSOMA (Figs. 5A, B, 6A–F). Eyes 2 + 2, in ocular plate; 30–34 dorsal idiosomal setae, including one pair of humeral setae, moderately covered with thin barbs, 8 setae in 1 st posthumeral row (C excluding humeral setae), by 6 setae in next three rows plus 2–8 caudal setae; 4 sternal setae; 21–24 ventral setae; NDV = 53–55. GNATHOSOMA (Fig. 6G, H). Cheliceral blade with tricuspid cap and dorsal tooth; cheliceral base, gnathobase, palpal femur and genu with puncta; gnathobase with 1 pair of branched gnathocoxal (tritorostral) setae; galeal (deutorostral) seta nude; palpal claw with three prongs; setae on palpal femur and genu branched; dorsal and lateral setae on palpal tibia nude; ventral palpal tibial seta branched; palpal tarsus with 7 branched setae and tarsala (ω). SCUTUM (Figs. 5A, B, 6C, D). Nearly trapezoidal, telostigmal, moderately covered with small puncta, anterior scutal margin sinuous, lateral margins slightly concave, posterior margin slightly projected, bow-shaped; ALs and PLs situated in projected angles of scutum; AM posterior to level of ALs; sensillary (trichobothrial) bases anterior to level of PLs (PSB – P-PL = 3–8); all scutal setae uniform with dorsal idiosomal setae; PL ≥ AL >> AM; sensilla (trichobothria) subglobose, covered with small setules. LEGS (Fig. 6I–K). All 7-segmented, with 1 pair of claws and claw-like empodium. Leg I: coxa with 1 branched seta (1B); trochanter 1B; basifemur 1B; telofemur 5B; genu 4B, 2 genualae (σ), microgenuala (κ); tibia 8B, 2 tibialae (φ), microtibiala (κ); tarsus 22B, tarsala (ω), microtarsala (ε) distal to tarsala, subterminala (ζ), parasubterminala (z), pretarsala (ζ). Leg II: coxa 1B; trochanter 1B; basifemur 2B; telofemur 3B; genu 3B, genuala (σ); tibia 6B, 2 tibialae (φ); tarsus 16B, tarsala (ω), microtarsala (ε) behind tarsala, pretarsala (ζ). Leg III: coxa 1B; trochanter 1B; basifemur 2B; telofemur 3B; genu 3B, genuala (σ); tibia 5B, tibiala (φ), mastitibiala; tarsus 14B, mastitarsala. Note. *—after Vercammen-Grandjean (1966). Distribution and hosts. This species was described from Glen Craig, Grahamstown (currently Makhanda, Eastern Cape), South Africa, ex Aethomys namaquensis (A. Smith) (syn. Thallomys namaquensis grahami Roberts) (Rodentia: Muridae). Ascoschoengastia rhabdomyia was described from Champagne Castle, Drakensberg Mts., Natal, South Africa, ex Rhabdomys pumilio (Rodentia: Muridae) and Procavia capensis capensis (Pallas) (syn. P. c. natalensis Roberts) (Hyracoidea: Procaviidae). Material examined. Holotype larva of Ascoschoengastia longispina, NHM 1948 -2-3-31, ex Thallomys n. grahami, Grahamstown, Glen Craig, 24 May 1939, Dr. G. Theiler (Fig. 1, 11). Topotypic larva of A. longispina, labeled as Euschoengastia longispina (Radford), ZIN 14503, ex Thallomys n. grahami, Grahamstown, Glen Craig, 24 May 1939, G. Theiler (Fig. 1, 12). Eight non-type specimens, larvae of A. rhabdomyia on two slides (NM 5387 and 5388), ex P. c. natalensis, P’Maritzburg (Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal Prov.), February 1951, collector unknown (Fig. 1, 13). Remarks. As in the case of H. alticolus, Vercammen-Grandjean (1965b, 1966) followed by Stekolnikov (2018) included H. rabdomyia in the subgenus Herpetacarus (Herpetacarus) without examination of any material. However, the absence of palpal subterminala (ζ) shows that this species should belong to the subgenus Herpetacarus (Abonnencia). The examined specimens of A. rhabdomyia differ from the holotype of A. longispina only in a slightly lesser size (Table 3). Thus, identity of these two species is indubitable and I regard A. rhabdomyia as a synonym of H. longispinus. This species is similar to Herpetacarus (Abonnencia) aethomys (Radford, 1942) and differs from it in nude dorsal palpal tibial seta vs. branched (fPp = B/B/NNB vs. B/B/BNB), bow-shaped posterior scutal margin vs. evenly arquate, shorter scutum (PSB = 16–20 vs. 25; SD = 41–45 vs. 56), and in a slightly higher number of idiosomal setae (NDV = 53–57 vs. 50) (Vercammen-Grandjean 1966).