Clinical and Radiographic Comparison between Piezoelectric Implant Osteotomy Preparation versus Conventional Drilling Technique

Piezo-surgery was introduced for implant site preparation due to its atraumaticcapabilities in preparation of the recipient bed thus offering improvedosseointegration and better bone healing. OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the effectof using piezoelectric bone surgery for implant osteotomy preparation onimplant stability and osteointegration compared with conventional drillingtechniques. METHODS: 16 implants equally installed in the maxillary anterioror premolar regions of adult patients, divided into two groups: Group I where theimplant osteotomy site was performed using conventional drills. Group II wherethe implant osteotomy site was performed using specific piezoelectric inserts.All implants were clinically evaluated for implant stability using OSTELLdevice immediately after implant placement and 6 months postoperatively, aswell as radiographically by digital parallel periapical tecgnique immediatelypost-opertively, then after three and six months to assess changes in relativebone density using digora software. RESULTS: Both groups showed asignificant increase in implant stability values (ostell readings) throughout thestudy period. Piezoelectric osteotomy group showed statistically higher Ostellvalues after six months in comparison to the conventional drilling group.Radiographic evaluation showed that relative bone density values increased forboth groups at the apex, mesial and distal implant aspects throughout the studyperiod, with the highest density values at the six months period. Comparison indensity values between both groups showed statistically higher bone densityvalues in the piezoelectric osateotomy group after six months. Correlationbetween clinical implant stability values (Ostell readings) and radiographicbone density values showed a significant positive correlation at the six monthsfollow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Osseointegration is improvedsurrounding implants inserted in bone when Piezoelectric drilling is used fordrilling of osteotomy sites in the anterior maxillary region can be a successfuloption for increasing implant stability values throughout the healing period incomparison to conventional drilling techniques.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15347714
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical and Radiographic Comparison between Piezoelectric Implant Osteotomy Preparation versus Conventional Drilling Technique

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
article

Clinical and Radiographic Comparison between Piezoelectric Implant Osteotomy Preparation versus Conventional Drilling Technique

article en

Abstract

Piezo-surgery was introduced for implant site preparation due to its atraumaticcapabilities in preparation of the recipient bed thus offering improvedosseointegration and better bone healing. OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the effectof using piezoelectric bone surgery for implant osteotomy preparation onimplant stability and osteointegration compared with conventional drillingtechniques. METHODS: 16 implants equally installed in the maxillary anterioror premolar regions of adult patients, divided into two groups: Group I where theimplant osteotomy site was performed using conventional drills. Group II wherethe implant osteotomy site was performed using specific piezoelectric inserts.All implants were clinically evaluated for implant stability using OSTELLdevice immediately after implant placement and 6 months postoperatively, aswell as radiographically by digital parallel periapical tecgnique immediatelypost-opertively, then after three and six months to assess changes in relativebone density using digora software. RESULTS: Both groups showed asignificant increase in implant stability values (ostell readings) throughout thestudy period. Piezoelectric osteotomy group showed statistically higher Ostellvalues after six months in comparison to the conventional drilling group.Radiographic evaluation showed that relative bone density values increased forboth groups at the apex, mesial and distal implant aspects throughout the studyperiod, with the highest density values at the six months period. Comparison indensity values between both groups showed statistically higher bone densityvalues in the piezoelectric osateotomy group after six months. Correlationbetween clinical implant stability values (Ostell readings) and radiographicbone density values showed a significant positive correlation at the six monthsfollow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Osseointegration is improvedsurrounding implants inserted in bone when Piezoelectric drilling is used fordrilling of osteotomy sites in the anterior maxillary region can be a successfuloption for increasing implant stability values throughout the healing period incomparison to conventional drilling techniques.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Suez Canal University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Clinical and Radiographic Comparison between Piezoelectric Implant Osteotomy Preparation versus Conventional Drilling Technique · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS