Earthquake Behaviour of Flat Slab Buildings – An Elastic Study

Abstract: Buildings are provided with flat slabs due to their versatility in interior design, architectural needs, rapidity in construction, and reduced storey height. But such buildings evidenced poor performance from past earthquakes sustaining brittle damages. Therefore, IS 1893-1 places restrictions on the design of a flat slab building with a response reduction factor of R = 3 considering (i) RC structural walls designed to resist entire lateral loads; (ii) perimeter RC special moment resisting frames designed to resist 25% lateral loads; and (if possible) an outrigger and belt truss system that connects the core structural wall and perimeter frames. Therefore, a set of RC buildings with different flat slab buildings is considered, and responses from equivalent static analysis (ESA) and model analyses are compared with conventional slab buildings. Response parameters considered include (i) the distribution of hogging and sagging moments in the slab under gravity and lateral loads; (ii) diaphragm flexibility; (iii) maximum interstorey drift; (iv) storey shear; (v) the modal mass participation ratio and natural period; and (vi) base shear. The bending moment in slabs increases in flat slab buildings under gravity loads and is reduced under lateral loads with the provision of structural walls. It is necessary to design flat slab buildings for huge forces, considering diaphragm action, and checking for diaphragm flexibility without including rigid diaphragms. The provision of perimeter beams with structural walls may increase the structural performance under inelastic actions, but it requires a detailed study.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14234489
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Earthquake Behaviour of Flat Slab Buildings – An Elastic Study

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Earthquake Behaviour of Flat Slab Buildings – An Elastic Study

article en

Abstract

Abstract: Buildings are provided with flat slabs due to their versatility in interior design, architectural needs, rapidity in construction, and reduced storey height. But such buildings evidenced poor performance from past earthquakes sustaining brittle damages. Therefore, IS 1893-1 places restrictions on the design of a flat slab building with a response reduction factor of R = 3 considering (i) RC structural walls designed to resist entire lateral loads; (ii) perimeter RC special moment resisting frames designed to resist 25% lateral loads; and (if possible) an outrigger and belt truss system that connects the core structural wall and perimeter frames. Therefore, a set of RC buildings with different flat slab buildings is considered, and responses from equivalent static analysis (ESA) and model analyses are compared with conventional slab buildings. Response parameters considered include (i) the distribution of hogging and sagging moments in the slab under gravity and lateral loads; (ii) diaphragm flexibility; (iii) maximum interstorey drift; (iv) storey shear; (v) the modal mass participation ratio and natural period; and (vi) base shear. The bending moment in slabs increases in flat slab buildings under gravity loads and is reduced under lateral loads with the provision of structural walls. It is necessary to design flat slab buildings for huge forces, considering diaphragm action, and checking for diaphragm flexibility without including rigid diaphragms. The provision of perimeter beams with structural walls may increase the structural performance under inelastic actions, but it requires a detailed study.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology Surat (IN), National Institute of Technology Srinagar (IN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.