Discourse-Pragmatic Functions of Modal Auxiliary Verbs of English in Doctor-Patient Verbal Interactions at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria

Doctor-patient interactions in hospitals constitute a communicative situation in which doctors strive to identify andunderstand their patients’ medical needs through dialoguing in order to offer effective diagnosis and treatment. Previous scholarlyworks on the problems of communication between doctors and patients, particularly from linguistic and pragmatic perspectives,have examined communicative styles and such phenomena as speech acts, conversational maxims, (im)politeness, questions ofpower and discourse devices that lead to good or bad effects, with little attention paid to the communicative potentials of linguisticmodality. This study, therefore, explored the discourse-pragmatic functions of English modal auxiliary verbs (may, would, can,could, etc.) in doctor-patient interactions at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria, in order to determine thecommunicative value of linguistic modality for further understanding of doctor-patient clinical interactions. Schneider et al.’spragmatic model and Sack et al’s conversation analysis complemented by M.A.K. Halliday’s Systemic Functional Grammar wereadopted as theoretical and methodological frameworks. Recorded data on clinical interactions involving five doctors and twentypatients were purposively sampled and subjected to discourse-pragmatic analysis. Beyond their conventional functions, modalauxiliary verbs performed a range of context-dependent variety of pragmatic functions: doctors’ epistemic and authoritativecertainty, obligation, clarification, advice, etc. Modality allowed the interlocutors to negotiate multiple interactional andinterpersonal meanings. Might, maybe, can, cannot, should expressed certainty/uncertainty, impropriety, ineligibility, promise,and command, respectively. Thus, modal auxiliary verbs of English constitute a remarkable discourse tool, performing significantpragmatic functions capable of enhancing doctor-patient clinical interactions and communication in the Nigerian context.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14934805
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discourse-Pragmatic Functions of Modal Auxiliary Verbs of English in Doctor-Patient Verbal Interactions at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
article

Discourse-Pragmatic Functions of Modal Auxiliary Verbs of English in Doctor-Patient Verbal Interactions at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria

article en

Abstract

Doctor-patient interactions in hospitals constitute a communicative situation in which doctors strive to identify andunderstand their patients’ medical needs through dialoguing in order to offer effective diagnosis and treatment. Previous scholarlyworks on the problems of communication between doctors and patients, particularly from linguistic and pragmatic perspectives,have examined communicative styles and such phenomena as speech acts, conversational maxims, (im)politeness, questions ofpower and discourse devices that lead to good or bad effects, with little attention paid to the communicative potentials of linguisticmodality. This study, therefore, explored the discourse-pragmatic functions of English modal auxiliary verbs (may, would, can,could, etc.) in doctor-patient interactions at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria, in order to determine thecommunicative value of linguistic modality for further understanding of doctor-patient clinical interactions. Schneider et al.’spragmatic model and Sack et al’s conversation analysis complemented by M.A.K. Halliday’s Systemic Functional Grammar wereadopted as theoretical and methodological frameworks. Recorded data on clinical interactions involving five doctors and twentypatients were purposively sampled and subjected to discourse-pragmatic analysis. Beyond their conventional functions, modalauxiliary verbs performed a range of context-dependent variety of pragmatic functions: doctors’ epistemic and authoritativecertainty, obligation, clarification, advice, etc. Modality allowed the interlocutors to negotiate multiple interactional andinterpersonal meanings. Might, maybe, can, cannot, should expressed certainty/uncertainty, impropriety, ineligibility, promise,and command, respectively. Thus, modal auxiliary verbs of English constitute a remarkable discourse tool, performing significantpragmatic functions capable of enhancing doctor-patient clinical interactions and communication in the Nigerian context.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.