Exploring a Critical Methodological Gap in Measuring of Field-Differences in Survey Research: Insights into Scientific Data Sharing and Beyond

This study explores a critical methodological gap in accurately measuring differences across scientific fields within survey research. It focuses on analyzing field-differences in scientific data sharing practices. By examining existing methodologies, the study aims to shed light on the limitations of current field-comparative survey research and inspire the development of more robust methodologies. The study conducts a literature review of the state of the art of field-comparative survey designs by systematically analyzing survey studies on data sharing and the instruments used. Preliminary findings underscore a common reliance on formal discipline classifications to delineate variations in data sharing practices among fields, while also highlighting a dearth of studies explaining these differences. This indicates a need for more nuanced methodological approaches in survey literature considering epistemic properties that underpin knowledge production within specific fields.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14161803
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring a Critical Methodological Gap in Measuring of Field-Differences in Survey Research: Insights into Scientific Data Sharing and Beyond

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Exploring a Critical Methodological Gap in Measuring of Field-Differences in Survey Research: Insights into Scientific Data Sharing and Beyond

article en

Abstract

This study explores a critical methodological gap in accurately measuring differences across scientific fields within survey research. It focuses on analyzing field-differences in scientific data sharing practices. By examining existing methodologies, the study aims to shed light on the limitations of current field-comparative survey research and inspire the development of more robust methodologies. The study conducts a literature review of the state of the art of field-comparative survey designs by systematically analyzing survey studies on data sharing and the instruments used. Preliminary findings underscore a common reliance on formal discipline classifications to delineate variations in data sharing practices among fields, while also highlighting a dearth of studies explaining these differences. This indicates a need for more nuanced methodological approaches in survey literature considering epistemic properties that underpin knowledge production within specific fields.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring a Critical Methodological Gap in Measuring of Field-Differences in Survey Research: Insights into Scientific Data Sharing and Beyond · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS