Leadership Development Radar

The Leadership Development Radar (LDR) is an innovative assessment tool for evaluating leaders’ professional development. It operates by a dual approach that facilitates a 360-degree view of leadership performance. By analyzing radar diagrams generated from the LDR scoring system, leaders can visually assess their strengths and areas for improvement. This paper presents the findings from a pilot study that rigorously tested the reliability and validity of these inventories. The LDR self-report inventory demonstrated a high internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.89, while the observer-report inventory achieved a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.87, indicating strong reliability. Exploratory factor analysis revealed four distinct factors for the self-report inventory and three for the observer-report inventory, collectively explaining 77.6% and 58.8% of the variance, respectively. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed good model fit with Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) values below 0.08 and Comparative Fit Index (CFI) values exceeding 0.90 for both inventories. Besides, significant positive correlations (r = 0.72) between self-reported scores and peer feedback underscored the concurrent validity of the LDR. These findings affirm that the LDR is a reliable and valid tool for assessing leadership capabilities. It provides organizational leaders with practical recommendations for professional development. The LDR inventories are included in this paper.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14005211
Primary Topic
Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leadership Development Radar

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
article

Leadership Development Radar

article en

Abstract

The Leadership Development Radar (LDR) is an innovative assessment tool for evaluating leaders’ professional development. It operates by a dual approach that facilitates a 360-degree view of leadership performance. By analyzing radar diagrams generated from the LDR scoring system, leaders can visually assess their strengths and areas for improvement. This paper presents the findings from a pilot study that rigorously tested the reliability and validity of these inventories. The LDR self-report inventory demonstrated a high internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.89, while the observer-report inventory achieved a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.87, indicating strong reliability. Exploratory factor analysis revealed four distinct factors for the self-report inventory and three for the observer-report inventory, collectively explaining 77.6% and 58.8% of the variance, respectively. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed good model fit with Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) values below 0.08 and Comparative Fit Index (CFI) values exceeding 0.90 for both inventories. Besides, significant positive correlations (r = 0.72) between self-reported scores and peer feedback underscored the concurrent validity of the LDR. These findings affirm that the LDR is a reliable and valid tool for assessing leadership capabilities. It provides organizational leaders with practical recommendations for professional development. The LDR inventories are included in this paper.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.