Environmental Policy, Economics, Planning & Regulation

Abstract This research paper explores the intricate intersection of environmental policy, economics, planning, and regulation, with a focus on achieving sustainable development amid escalating ecological challenges. It critically analyses the role of economic instruments like carbon pricing, green taxes, and market-based mechanisms in addressing environmental externalities, while also emphasizing the continuing importance of command-and-control regulatory frameworks. The study is grounded in foundational theories of environmental economics such as Pigouvian Taxation, the Coase Theorem, the Environmental Kuznets Curve, and the Tragedy of the Commons. Through a comparative analysis of global policy models — including Germany’s successful energy transition, Brazil’s faltering deforestation control, and India’s evolving carbon market — the paper assesses the practical implementation, successes, and shortcomings of different strategies. The methodology integrates both qualitative and quantitative tools, including econometric models, SWOT analysis, and scenario-based simulations using CGE models. It highlights the need for hybrid policy instruments, improved institutional capacities, participatory governance, and robust monitoring systems. Special attention is given to the challenges faced by developing countries such as India, where balancing economic growth with environmental preservation remains a critical task. The paper concludes that while market-based solutions hold promise, their effectiveness is contingent upon strong institutions, transparency, and international cooperation. It calls for an interdisciplinary, systems-thinking approach to environmental governance that aligns economic planning with climate resilience and social equity. Future research should explore decentralized governance models, behavioural economics applications, and comparative assessments of carbon markets across emerging economies. Ultimately, this work contributes to shaping a sustainable and equitable policy roadmap, bridging the gap between environmental urgency and economic pragmatism.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16872632
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental Policy, Economics, Planning & Regulation

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Plant and animal studies
article

Environmental Policy, Economics, Planning & Regulation

article en

Abstract

Abstract This research paper explores the intricate intersection of environmental policy, economics, planning, and regulation, with a focus on achieving sustainable development amid escalating ecological challenges. It critically analyses the role of economic instruments like carbon pricing, green taxes, and market-based mechanisms in addressing environmental externalities, while also emphasizing the continuing importance of command-and-control regulatory frameworks. The study is grounded in foundational theories of environmental economics such as Pigouvian Taxation, the Coase Theorem, the Environmental Kuznets Curve, and the Tragedy of the Commons. Through a comparative analysis of global policy models — including Germany’s successful energy transition, Brazil’s faltering deforestation control, and India’s evolving carbon market — the paper assesses the practical implementation, successes, and shortcomings of different strategies. The methodology integrates both qualitative and quantitative tools, including econometric models, SWOT analysis, and scenario-based simulations using CGE models. It highlights the need for hybrid policy instruments, improved institutional capacities, participatory governance, and robust monitoring systems. Special attention is given to the challenges faced by developing countries such as India, where balancing economic growth with environmental preservation remains a critical task. The paper concludes that while market-based solutions hold promise, their effectiveness is contingent upon strong institutions, transparency, and international cooperation. It calls for an interdisciplinary, systems-thinking approach to environmental governance that aligns economic planning with climate resilience and social equity. Future research should explore decentralized governance models, behavioural economics applications, and comparative assessments of carbon markets across emerging economies. Ultimately, this work contributes to shaping a sustainable and equitable policy roadmap, bridging the gap between environmental urgency and economic pragmatism.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Samjin Pharm (South Korea) (KR), Department of Commerce (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Environmental Policy, Economics, Planning & Regulation · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS