Policy Brief - Culture's Role in Navigating Technological Change

The policy brief published by KT4D suggests that examining culture allows for a deeper understanding of societal responses to AI development. Rather than applying only the current proposed risk assessment framework which greatly underestimates the cultural and societal impacts of AI technologies, KT4D argues that the appearance of culture within the regulatory frameworks must be refined, clarified and strengthened, a process to which the mechanisms outlined in the policy brief could contribute. Indeed a culture-centric approach highlights the diverse and complex ways in which communities navigate technological advancements. This approach acknowledges that new media are embedded within ongoing processes of meaning negotiation. As technology continues to evolve rapidly, democratic processes and civic engagement face mounting challenges. It is imperative for policymakers to protect the cultural dimension from potential AI harms, fostering a harmonious relationship between technological advancements and democratic principles. The authors argue that by prioritising cultural preservation alongside technological regulation, policymakers can develop more effective and equitable policies. This not only aligns with ethical considerations but also harnesses the invaluable insights offered by cultural responses to AI development.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14768234
Primary Topic
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Policy Brief - Culture's Role in Navigating Technological Change

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
article

Policy Brief - Culture's Role in Navigating Technological Change

article en

Abstract

The policy brief published by KT4D suggests that examining culture allows for a deeper understanding of societal responses to AI development. Rather than applying only the current proposed risk assessment framework which greatly underestimates the cultural and societal impacts of AI technologies, KT4D argues that the appearance of culture within the regulatory frameworks must be refined, clarified and strengthened, a process to which the mechanisms outlined in the policy brief could contribute. Indeed a culture-centric approach highlights the diverse and complex ways in which communities navigate technological advancements. This approach acknowledges that new media are embedded within ongoing processes of meaning negotiation. As technology continues to evolve rapidly, democratic processes and civic engagement face mounting challenges. It is imperative for policymakers to protect the cultural dimension from potential AI harms, fostering a harmonious relationship between technological advancements and democratic principles. The authors argue that by prioritising cultural preservation alongside technological regulation, policymakers can develop more effective and equitable policies. This not only aligns with ethical considerations but also harnesses the invaluable insights offered by cultural responses to AI development.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Science Foundation Ireland (IE), Trinity College Dublin (IE), Horizon Research (United States) (US), Trust IT Services (GB)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.