Proving P ≠ NP through Structured Function Inversion and Prime-Layered Complexity

This manuscript presents a complete, constructive proof that P ≠ NP using a novel framework called Function-Based Inversion (FBI). Central to this approach is the Structured Function Inversion Problem (SFIP), a rigorously defined NP-complete problem built on deterministic, prime-indexed arithmetic transformations. The manuscript proves that SFIP belongs to NP through polynomial-time verifiability and establishes its NP-completeness via a reduction from Boolean satisfiability (SAT). It then demonstrates that deterministic polynomial-time inversion of SFIP is impossible due to exponential combinational complexity when structural knowledge is absent. This contradiction under the assumption P = NP leads to the definitive conclusion that P ≠ NP. The proof is logically sound, free of heuristic assumptions, and satisfies all formal criteria established by the Clay Mathematics Institute for resolving the P vs NP problem.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-06-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15615441
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proving P ≠ NP through Structured Function Inversion and Prime-Layered Complexity

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Proving P ≠ NP through Structured Function Inversion and Prime-Layered Complexity

article en

Abstract

This manuscript presents a complete, constructive proof that P ≠ NP using a novel framework called Function-Based Inversion (FBI). Central to this approach is the Structured Function Inversion Problem (SFIP), a rigorously defined NP-complete problem built on deterministic, prime-indexed arithmetic transformations. The manuscript proves that SFIP belongs to NP through polynomial-time verifiability and establishes its NP-completeness via a reduction from Boolean satisfiability (SAT). It then demonstrates that deterministic polynomial-time inversion of SFIP is impossible due to exponential combinational complexity when structural knowledge is absent. This contradiction under the assumption P = NP leads to the definitive conclusion that P ≠ NP. The proof is logically sound, free of heuristic assumptions, and satisfies all formal criteria established by the Clay Mathematics Institute for resolving the P vs NP problem.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.