SuperHyperSoft Set for Selection Strategies for Achieving Human Rights in Artificial Intelligence through Civil Public Interest Litigation

Making sure AI technologies respect and uphold human rights is crucial as AI gets more and more integrated into social structures. AI systems that are unethical or discriminatory may be challenged in court through civil public interest litigation (CPIL). To assess and choose strategic options for realizing human rights through CPIL in the AI domain, this study creates a SuperHyperSoft Set model with multicriteria decision making (MCDM) approach. We evaluate eight workable options and identify 14 criteria that represent ethical, legal, technological, and social aspects. The SuperHyperSoft Set is used to deal with different criteria values. ORESTE is used to rank the alternatives. The suggested model assists decision-makers in choosing the best advocacy and litigation tactics that are in line with AI deployment's human rights safeguards.