Military and military technical terminology in Russian, English and Persian languages)

This article discusses complex terms formed by word formation in the field of military and military‑technical terminology in Russian, English and Persian. Scientific novelty ‑ the article examined the characteristics of word formation in the analyzed languages. The relevance of the topic lies in the fact that currently the problems of military terminology represent one of the current areas of linguistic research. The purpose of the article is to study the word‑formation and structural‑semantic features of military and military‑technical complex terminology. The implementation of this goal requires solving the following tasks: 1) determine the characteristics of word composition 2) identify the main structural types of word composition; 3) description of structural models of terms used in military and military‑technical fields; 4) identify productive word‑formation models of word formation in the languages under consideration. To achieve the set objectives, comparative, structural word‑formation, and semantic methods were used. We used the comparative method to identify general (similarities) and specific (differences) features of the design of terminology. From the considered Russian, English and Persian military terminology formed by compounding, it is understood that in Russian and English terminologies compounding takes a more active position than in Persian.