Electronic Pain Assessment and the Role of Nurses in Pain Management

Background: Pain management is a fundamental aspect of clinical care, yet traditional pain assessment methods rely heavily on subjective self-reporting, which can lead to inconsistencies and inadequate treatment. The integration of electronic pain assessment tools, including artificial intelligence (AI), wearable sensors, and electronic health records (EHRs), has shown promise in improving pain measurement accuracy, clinical workflow, and patient outcomes. Objective: This study examines the impact of electronic pain assessment technologies on pain measurement accuracy, nursing workflow efficiency, and patient satisfaction. Additionally, it explores barriers to implementation and provides recommendations for integrating digital pain management into routine clinical practice. Methods: A systematic literature review and quantitative analysis were conducted to assess the effectiveness of electronic pain assessment tools. Data were collected from clinical trials, observational studies, and real-world applications, focusing on accuracy, workflow efficiency, and patient-reported outcomes. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, and regression models to evaluate differences between traditional and electronic pain assessment methods. Results: The findings suggest that electronic pain assessment tools significantly improve accuracy, with AI-based and wearable sensor technologies demonstrating the highest reliability compared to conventional self-report scales. Additionally, the adoption of digital pain assessment reduced documentation time by 32% and improved adherence to standardized pain protocols. Patients assessed using electronic methods reported higher satisfaction rates and lower incidence of undertreated pain. However, barriers to adoption include interoperability challenges, data security concerns, and insufficient provider training. Conclusion: Electronic pain assessment enhances clinical decision-making, workflow efficiency, and patient outcomes. Addressing barriers such as system interoperability, cybersecurity, and provider training is essential for successful implementation. Future research should focus on AI-driven predictive pain management and cost-effectiveness evaluations to support large-scale adoption. MeSH Keywords: Pain assessment, Artificial intelligence, Nursing informatics, Wearable technology, Digital health, Electronic health records, Pain management, Machine learning, Healthcare technology.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14910935
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Opioid Use
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Electronic Pain Assessment and the Role of Nurses in Pain Management

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Pain Management and Opioid Use
article

Electronic Pain Assessment and the Role of Nurses in Pain Management

article en

Abstract

Background: Pain management is a fundamental aspect of clinical care, yet traditional pain assessment methods rely heavily on subjective self-reporting, which can lead to inconsistencies and inadequate treatment. The integration of electronic pain assessment tools, including artificial intelligence (AI), wearable sensors, and electronic health records (EHRs), has shown promise in improving pain measurement accuracy, clinical workflow, and patient outcomes. Objective: This study examines the impact of electronic pain assessment technologies on pain measurement accuracy, nursing workflow efficiency, and patient satisfaction. Additionally, it explores barriers to implementation and provides recommendations for integrating digital pain management into routine clinical practice. Methods: A systematic literature review and quantitative analysis were conducted to assess the effectiveness of electronic pain assessment tools. Data were collected from clinical trials, observational studies, and real-world applications, focusing on accuracy, workflow efficiency, and patient-reported outcomes. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, and regression models to evaluate differences between traditional and electronic pain assessment methods. Results: The findings suggest that electronic pain assessment tools significantly improve accuracy, with AI-based and wearable sensor technologies demonstrating the highest reliability compared to conventional self-report scales. Additionally, the adoption of digital pain assessment reduced documentation time by 32% and improved adherence to standardized pain protocols. Patients assessed using electronic methods reported higher satisfaction rates and lower incidence of undertreated pain. However, barriers to adoption include interoperability challenges, data security concerns, and insufficient provider training. Conclusion: Electronic pain assessment enhances clinical decision-making, workflow efficiency, and patient outcomes. Addressing barriers such as system interoperability, cybersecurity, and provider training is essential for successful implementation. Future research should focus on AI-driven predictive pain management and cost-effectiveness evaluations to support large-scale adoption. MeSH Keywords: Pain assessment, Artificial intelligence, Nursing informatics, Wearable technology, Digital health, Electronic health records, Pain management, Machine learning, Healthcare technology.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Government Medical College (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Pain Management and Opioid Use
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.