Ceramonema Cobb 1920

Ceramonema Cobb, 1920 Ceramonema Cobb, 1920: 264, fig. 48. Ceramonemoides Haspeslagh, 1973: 264. Cyttaronema Haspeslagh,, 1973: 176. Proceramonema Tchesunov & Miljutina, 2002: 17, figs 9–11. Type species Ceramonema attenuatum Cobb, 1920. Diagnosis (from Tchesunov & Miljutina 2002) Body cuticle consists of 70–320 broad and thick annules. Annules equal or unequal in width. If unequal, their width increases gradually from first subcephalic annule to those near cardia; then annule width drops sharply and again increases gradually to broad anal annule; following annules on tail narrow gradually to terminal cone. Intracuticular vacuolisation in annules may be present. Annule zygapophyses present or absent. Six or eight longitudinal crests extended along body. Labial region not set off. Setose outer labial sensilla and cephalic setae arranged in two separate circles. Amphids loop-shaped, elongate or rounded. Remarks Tchesunov&Miljutina(2002) suggested to split the genus into two groups of species:one group comprising species with distinct zygapophyses and a second group comprising species with small / indistinct zygapophyses (as seen using light microscopy). The key to species of the genus Ceramonema provided by Tchesunov & Miljutina (2002) did not include the two species described by Bussau (1993), which are considered valid by Holovachov (2020). Three species were subsequently described by Holovachov et al. (2008), bringing the total number of valid species of Ceramonema described prior to this study to 23. List of valid species of Ceramonema Cobb, 1920 Group 1: species with distinct zygapophyses C. africana Furstenberg & Vincx, 1993 C. algoensis Furstenberg & Vincx, 1993 C. attenuatum Cobb, 1920 C. carinatum Wieser, 1959 C. chitwoodi De Coninck, 1942 C. fluctuosum Tchesunov & Miljutina, 2002 C. kromensis Furstenberg & Vincx, 1993 C. pisanum Gerlach, 1953 C. racovitzai Andrássy, 1973 C. reticulatum Chitwood, 1936 C. salsicum Gerlach, 1956 C. taikoraha sp. nov. C. taiora sp. nov. C. undulatum De Coninck, 1942 C. yunfengi Platt & Zhang, 1982 Group 2: species with small / indistinct zygapophyses C. altogolfi Holovachov, Tandingan De Ley, Mundo-Ocampo, Baldwin, Rocha-Olivares & De Ley, 2008 C. aureolum Bussau, 1993 C. filipjevi De Coninck, 1942 C. inguinispina Holovachov, Tandingan De Ley, Mundo-Ocampo, Baldwin, Rocha-Olivares & De Ley, 2008 C. manganum Bussau, 1993 C. marisalbi Tchesunov & Miljutina, 2002 C. mokievskii Tchesunov & Miljutina, 2002 C. nasobema Holovachov, Mundo-Ocampo, Tandingan De Ley & De Ley, 2008 C. rectum Gerlach, 1957 C. rhombus Andrássy, 1973 Key to species of Ceramonema Cobb, 1920 (Group 1 with distinct zygapophyses) (updated from Tchesunov & Miljutina 2002) 1. Body length> 700 µm ...................................................................................................................... 2 – Body length <700 µm, less than 90 body annules. Amphid small, about 8 µm long and 4 µm wide, or less .............................................................................................. C undulatum De Coninck, 1942 2. Body slender, ratio of a ≥ 80 ............................................................................................................. 3 – Body relatively stout, ratio of a ≤ 70 ................................................................................................ 4 3. Lip region elevated, cap-like, number of body annules 300–307 (male) or 315 (female) ................. ............................................................................................. C. algoensis Furstenberg & Vincx, 1993 – Lip region not elevated, number of body annules much greater in males (287) than in females (184– 186) .............................................................................................. C. yungfengi Platt & Zhang, 1982 4. Cephalic ratio> 1 .............................................................................................................................. 5 – Cephalic ratio <1 .................................................................................. C. racovitzai Andrássy, 1973 5. Intracuticular vacuolisation in body annules and/ or cephalic capsule present ................................ 6 – Intracuticular vacuolisation absent ................................................................................................. 13 6. Cephalic capsule without intracuticular vacuolisation ..................................................................... 7 – Cephalic capsule with intracuticular vacuolisation .......................................................................... 9 7. Cephalic capsule elongate and evenly wide throughout its length, cephalic ratio ≥ 1.5, cephalic setae 8–12 µm ............................................................................................................................................ 8 – Cephalic capsule tapering anteriorly, cephalic ratio about 1, cephalic setae 6–9 µm, 111–117 body annules ............................................................................................. C. chitwoodi De Coninck, 1942 8. Amphid 26 µm long or> 65% of cephalic capsule length, cephalic ratio> 2 ................................... ...................................................................................... C. fluctuosum Tchesunov & Miljutina, 2002 – Amphid about 16 µm long or less than 45% of cephalic capsule length, cephalic ratio about 1.5 .... .................................................................................................................. C. carinatum Wieser, 1959 9. Cephalic ratio> 1, cephalic setae ≤ 0.3 length of cephalic capsule ............................................... 10 – Cephalic ratio about 1, length of cephalic setae> 0.5 length of cephalic capsule ............................. ........................................................................................................... C. reticulatum Chitwood, 1936 10. Amphid loop-shaped, elongate, 16–26 µm long, tail cone ≥ 19 µm long .......................................11 – Amphid loop-shaped, shorter, 9–15 µm long, tail cone 14–15 µm long ............................................ .............................................................................................. C. africana Furstenberg & Vincx, 1993 11. Male without precloacal spine ........................................................................................................ 12 – Male with precloacal spine, wide cloacal annule formed by fusion of two contiguous annules, 119– 127 body annules, ratio of a = 32–36 ..................................................................... C. taiora sp. nov. 12. Body length 1380–1428 µm, ratio of a = 49–60, ratio of c = 7 ........................ C. taikoraha sp. nov. – Body length = 960 µm, ratio of a = 38, ratio of c = 5 .............................. C. salsicum Gerlach, 1956 13. Cephalic ratio about 1.5 .................................................................................................................... 4 – Cephalic ratio about 1, amphid small (10 µm long), its anterior margin at level of cephalic setae, 213 body annules in male ........................................................ C. kromensis Furstenberg & Vincx, 1993 14. Amphid loop-shaped with equal branches, amphid length <0.3 cephalic capsule length, labial region protruded, body length about 1600 µm ..................................................... C. pisanum Gerlach, 1953 – Amphid loop-shaped, with unequal branches, amphid length> 0.5 cephalic capsule length, labial region not protruded, body length about 1100 µm .................................. C. attenuatum Cobb, 1920 Key to species of Ceramonema Cobb, 1920 (Group 2 with small or indistinct zygapophyses) (updated from Tchesunov & Miljutina 2002) 1. Perioral tube absent ........................................................................................................................... 2 – Perioral tube projecting 5–7 µm anterior to the lips. 121–134 body annules, pronounced sexual dimorphism in amphid shape with ventral branch extending to 55–80 th annule in males .................. ............................. C. nasobema Holovachov, Mundo-Ocampo, Tandingan De Ley & De Ley, 2008 2. Outer labial setae either ≤ 5 µm or ≥ 8 µm ....................................................................................... 3 – Outer labial setae about 6 µm long, slightly shorter than cephalic setae, body length 750–1200 µm, 86 body annules, ratio of a 30–40, small, loop-shaped amphids .......... C. manganum Bussau, 1993 3. Outer labial setae ≤ 5 µm .................................................................................................................. 4 – Outer labial setae ≥ 8 µm .................................................................................................................. 7 4. Body ≥ 700 µm long, body annules broad, 8–12 µm wide .............................................................. 5 – Body <600 µm long, with less than 100 narrow (2–7 µm wide) annules, cephalic ratio about 1.6 .. .............................................................................................................. C. filipjevi De Coninck, 1942 5. Cephalic ratio <1.2, amphids located mostly or completely within posterior half of cephalic capsule .............................................................................................................................................. 6 – Cephalic ratio = 1.3, female with small loop-shaped amphid located on anterior half of cephalic capsule ......................................................................................................... C. rectum Gerlach, 1957 6. 187–195 body annules, cephalic setae located about halfway down length of cephalic capsule ....... ................................................................................................................ C.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14396706
Primary Topic
Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ceramonema Cobb 1920

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
article

Ceramonema Cobb 1920

article en

Abstract

Ceramonema Cobb, 1920 Ceramonema Cobb, 1920: 264, fig. 48. Ceramonemoides Haspeslagh, 1973: 264. Cyttaronema Haspeslagh,, 1973: 176. Proceramonema Tchesunov & Miljutina, 2002: 17, figs 9–11. Type species Ceramonema attenuatum Cobb, 1920. Diagnosis (from Tchesunov & Miljutina 2002) Body cuticle consists of 70–320 broad and thick annules. Annules equal or unequal in width. If unequal, their width increases gradually from first subcephalic annule to those near cardia; then annule width drops sharply and again increases gradually to broad anal annule; following annules on tail narrow gradually to terminal cone. Intracuticular vacuolisation in annules may be present. Annule zygapophyses present or absent. Six or eight longitudinal crests extended along body. Labial region not set off. Setose outer labial sensilla and cephalic setae arranged in two separate circles. Amphids loop-shaped, elongate or rounded. Remarks Tchesunov&Miljutina(2002) suggested to split the genus into two groups of species:one group comprising species with distinct zygapophyses and a second group comprising species with small / indistinct zygapophyses (as seen using light microscopy). The key to species of the genus Ceramonema provided by Tchesunov & Miljutina (2002) did not include the two species described by Bussau (1993), which are considered valid by Holovachov (2020). Three species were subsequently described by Holovachov et al. (2008), bringing the total number of valid species of Ceramonema described prior to this study to 23. List of valid species of Ceramonema Cobb, 1920 Group 1: species with distinct zygapophyses C. africana Furstenberg & Vincx, 1993 C. algoensis Furstenberg & Vincx, 1993 C. attenuatum Cobb, 1920 C. carinatum Wieser, 1959 C. chitwoodi De Coninck, 1942 C. fluctuosum Tchesunov & Miljutina, 2002 C. kromensis Furstenberg & Vincx, 1993 C. pisanum Gerlach, 1953 C. racovitzai Andrássy, 1973 C. reticulatum Chitwood, 1936 C. salsicum Gerlach, 1956 C. taikoraha sp. nov. C. taiora sp. nov. C. undulatum De Coninck, 1942 C. yunfengi Platt & Zhang, 1982 Group 2: species with small / indistinct zygapophyses C. altogolfi Holovachov, Tandingan De Ley, Mundo-Ocampo, Baldwin, Rocha-Olivares & De Ley, 2008 C. aureolum Bussau, 1993 C. filipjevi De Coninck, 1942 C. inguinispina Holovachov, Tandingan De Ley, Mundo-Ocampo, Baldwin, Rocha-Olivares & De Ley, 2008 C. manganum Bussau, 1993 C. marisalbi Tchesunov & Miljutina, 2002 C. mokievskii Tchesunov & Miljutina, 2002 C. nasobema Holovachov, Mundo-Ocampo, Tandingan De Ley & De Ley, 2008 C. rectum Gerlach, 1957 C. rhombus Andrássy, 1973 Key to species of Ceramonema Cobb, 1920 (Group 1 with distinct zygapophyses) (updated from Tchesunov & Miljutina 2002) 1. Body length> 700 µm ...................................................................................................................... 2 – Body length <700 µm, less than 90 body annules. Amphid small, about 8 µm long and 4 µm wide, or less .............................................................................................. C undulatum De Coninck, 1942 2. Body slender, ratio of a ≥ 80 ............................................................................................................. 3 – Body relatively stout, ratio of a ≤ 70 ................................................................................................ 4 3. Lip region elevated, cap-like, number of body annules 300–307 (male) or 315 (female) ................. ............................................................................................. C. algoensis Furstenberg & Vincx, 1993 – Lip region not elevated, number of body annules much greater in males (287) than in females (184– 186) .............................................................................................. C. yungfengi Platt & Zhang, 1982 4. Cephalic ratio> 1 .............................................................................................................................. 5 – Cephalic ratio <1 .................................................................................. C. racovitzai Andrássy, 1973 5. Intracuticular vacuolisation in body annules and/ or cephalic capsule present ................................ 6 – Intracuticular vacuolisation absent ................................................................................................. 13 6. Cephalic capsule without intracuticular vacuolisation ..................................................................... 7 – Cephalic capsule with intracuticular vacuolisation .......................................................................... 9 7. Cephalic capsule elongate and evenly wide throughout its length, cephalic ratio ≥ 1.5, cephalic setae 8–12 µm ............................................................................................................................................ 8 – Cephalic capsule tapering anteriorly, cephalic ratio about 1, cephalic setae 6–9 µm, 111–117 body annules ............................................................................................. C. chitwoodi De Coninck, 1942 8. Amphid 26 µm long or> 65% of cephalic capsule length, cephalic ratio> 2 ................................... ...................................................................................... C. fluctuosum Tchesunov & Miljutina, 2002 – Amphid about 16 µm long or less than 45% of cephalic capsule length, cephalic ratio about 1.5 .... .................................................................................................................. C. carinatum Wieser, 1959 9. Cephalic ratio> 1, cephalic setae ≤ 0.3 length of cephalic capsule ............................................... 10 – Cephalic ratio about 1, length of cephalic setae> 0.5 length of cephalic capsule ............................. ........................................................................................................... C. reticulatum Chitwood, 1936 10. Amphid loop-shaped, elongate, 16–26 µm long, tail cone ≥ 19 µm long .......................................11 – Amphid loop-shaped, shorter, 9–15 µm long, tail cone 14–15 µm long ............................................ .............................................................................................. C. africana Furstenberg & Vincx, 1993 11. Male without precloacal spine ........................................................................................................ 12 – Male with precloacal spine, wide cloacal annule formed by fusion of two contiguous annules, 119– 127 body annules, ratio of a = 32–36 ..................................................................... C. taiora sp. nov. 12. Body length 1380–1428 µm, ratio of a = 49–60, ratio of c = 7 ........................ C. taikoraha sp. nov. – Body length = 960 µm, ratio of a = 38, ratio of c = 5 .............................. C. salsicum Gerlach, 1956 13. Cephalic ratio about 1.5 .................................................................................................................... 4 – Cephalic ratio about 1, amphid small (10 µm long), its anterior margin at level of cephalic setae, 213 body annules in male ........................................................ C. kromensis Furstenberg & Vincx, 1993 14. Amphid loop-shaped with equal branches, amphid length <0.3 cephalic capsule length, labial region protruded, body length about 1600 µm ..................................................... C. pisanum Gerlach, 1953 – Amphid loop-shaped, with unequal branches, amphid length> 0.5 cephalic capsule length, labial region not protruded, body length about 1100 µm .................................. C. attenuatum Cobb, 1920 Key to species of Ceramonema Cobb, 1920 (Group 2 with small or indistinct zygapophyses) (updated from Tchesunov & Miljutina 2002) 1. Perioral tube absent ........................................................................................................................... 2 – Perioral tube projecting 5–7 µm anterior to the lips. 121–134 body annules, pronounced sexual dimorphism in amphid shape with ventral branch extending to 55–80 th annule in males .................. ............................. C. nasobema Holovachov, Mundo-Ocampo, Tandingan De Ley & De Ley, 2008 2. Outer labial setae either ≤ 5 µm or ≥ 8 µm ....................................................................................... 3 – Outer labial setae about 6 µm long, slightly shorter than cephalic setae, body length 750–1200 µm, 86 body annules, ratio of a 30–40, small, loop-shaped amphids .......... C. manganum Bussau, 1993 3. Outer labial setae ≤ 5 µm .................................................................................................................. 4 – Outer labial setae ≥ 8 µm .................................................................................................................. 7 4. Body ≥ 700 µm long, body annules broad, 8–12 µm wide .............................................................. 5 – Body <600 µm long, with less than 100 narrow (2–7 µm wide) annules, cephalic ratio about 1.6 .. .............................................................................................................. C. filipjevi De Coninck, 1942 5. Cephalic ratio <1.2, amphids located mostly or completely within posterior half of cephalic capsule .............................................................................................................................................. 6 – Cephalic ratio = 1.3, female with small loop-shaped amphid located on anterior half of cephalic capsule ......................................................................................................... C. rectum Gerlach, 1957 6. 187–195 body annules, cephalic setae located about halfway down length of cephalic capsule ....... ................................................................................................................ C.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NZ)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.