D3.2 - User guidelines on EOSC PID implementation

This report presents the best practices of Persistent Identifiers (PIDs) for end users, as defined by seven integrated use case partners participating in the FAIR-IMPACT project. These partners represent diverse scientific domains, including photon and neutron sciences, life sciences, and earth & environmental sciences. The use cases span different stages of the research life cycle, demonstrating the critical role of PIDs in processes such as data production workflows, complex data citation events, and the management of metadata and sensitive data. Key topics explored include versioning, granularity, kernel metadata, machine-actionability, and research reproducibility in relation to PID minting practices. Currently, there is a lack of standardised cross-domain guidance and widely accepted best practices on PID usage. This report seeks to address this gap by providing clear, adaptable, and applicable across multiple scientific domains.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15081434
Primary Topic
Environmental Monitoring and Data Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

D3.2 - User guidelines on EOSC PID implementation

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Environmental Monitoring and Data Management
article

D3.2 - User guidelines on EOSC PID implementation

article en

Abstract

This report presents the best practices of Persistent Identifiers (PIDs) for end users, as defined by seven integrated use case partners participating in the FAIR-IMPACT project. These partners represent diverse scientific domains, including photon and neutron sciences, life sciences, and earth & environmental sciences. The use cases span different stages of the research life cycle, demonstrating the critical role of PIDs in processes such as data production workflows, complex data citation events, and the management of metadata and sensitive data. Key topics explored include versioning, granularity, kernel metadata, machine-actionability, and research reproducibility in relation to PID minting practices. Currently, there is a lack of standardised cross-domain guidance and widely accepted best practices on PID usage. This report seeks to address this gap by providing clear, adaptable, and applicable across multiple scientific domains.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Essex (GB), European Bioinformatics Institute (GB), Lyon College (US), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), UK Data Archive (GB), CSC - IT Center for Science (Finland) (FI), UK Data Service (GB)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Environmental Monitoring and Data Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

D3.2 - User guidelines on EOSC PID implementation · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS