Predictors of malignancy in STN vs MNG thyroid: Metanalysis

Background: The incidence of thyroid cancer is different between solitarynodular (SN) thyroid and multinodular goiter (MNG). Therefore, a meta-analysis is performed to evaluate the existing literature on the comparative incidence of thyroid cancer in SN versus MNG. Methods: Papers were identified using a systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, ScienceDirect, GoogleScholar, International Clinical Trials Registry and reference lists of included articles. There are no restrictions on time, study design, language or country of publication. Two independent reviewers screened the most relevant articles according to PRISMA guidelines. Results: Twenty-two studies were included in this analysis and included 50, 321 patients, of which 44.2% were in the STN subgroup and 55.37% were in the MNG subgroup. MNG was significantly associated with a lower risk of thyroid cancer compared to STN (OR=0.76; 95% CI 0.61-0.96). Papillary carcinoma was the most common carcinoma in both groups, followed by follicular and medullary carcinoma. Subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of the two most commonly used diagnostic tools, surgery and fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), but yielded non-significant results, indicating comparable utility between the two. Another subgroup analysis based on participants' assumed iodine status also yielded non-significant results. Conclusion: The incidence of thyroid cancer is higher in patients with STN, but since the available evidence on this topic is of low quality, it is important to carry out larger studies that confirm the association with precision.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14859471
Primary Topic
Folate and B Vitamins Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictors of malignancy in STN vs MNG thyroid: Metanalysis

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Folate and B Vitamins Research
article

Predictors of malignancy in STN vs MNG thyroid: Metanalysis

article en

Abstract

Background: The incidence of thyroid cancer is different between solitarynodular (SN) thyroid and multinodular goiter (MNG). Therefore, a meta-analysis is performed to evaluate the existing literature on the comparative incidence of thyroid cancer in SN versus MNG. Methods: Papers were identified using a systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, ScienceDirect, GoogleScholar, International Clinical Trials Registry and reference lists of included articles. There are no restrictions on time, study design, language or country of publication. Two independent reviewers screened the most relevant articles according to PRISMA guidelines. Results: Twenty-two studies were included in this analysis and included 50, 321 patients, of which 44.2% were in the STN subgroup and 55.37% were in the MNG subgroup. MNG was significantly associated with a lower risk of thyroid cancer compared to STN (OR=0.76; 95% CI 0.61-0.96). Papillary carcinoma was the most common carcinoma in both groups, followed by follicular and medullary carcinoma. Subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of the two most commonly used diagnostic tools, surgery and fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), but yielded non-significant results, indicating comparable utility between the two. Another subgroup analysis based on participants' assumed iodine status also yielded non-significant results. Conclusion: The incidence of thyroid cancer is higher in patients with STN, but since the available evidence on this topic is of low quality, it is important to carry out larger studies that confirm the association with precision.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Kanyakumari Government Medical College (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Folate and B Vitamins Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.