Cliona lobata Hancock 1849

Cliona lobata Hancock, 1849 Cliona lobata Hancock 1849: 341–342, pl. XII fig. 4, 8. Cliona lobata – Alander 1942: 80. ? Cliona howsei Hancock, 1849 – Levinsen 1893: 415 fig. 27. Material examined (2 specimens) SWEDEN • 1 spec.; 57.3042° N, 11.9321° E; 51– 49 m depth; 31 May 2007; Artprojektets Skagerrak-inventering leg. [KA68]; dredge; P082-111026-1; voucher: GNM Porifera 554 • 1 spec.; 58.1352° N, 11.2512° E; 51–49 m depth; 27 Aug. 2007; Artprojektets Skagerrak-inventering leg. [SK67]; dredge; P082-111026-2; voucher: GNM Porifera 555. Description The specimens had a boring morphology growing in shells, but papillae protruding from them. The colour in situ is unknown and light yellow when preserved in ethanol. Skeleton The skeleton is composed of megascleres, which are tylostyles measuring 230–350×7.5 µm (N=4), and spirasters as microscleres, which may be rare in some individuals, measuring 12.5–17.5µm (N=2) in length. Ecology and distribution The type locality is in the English Channel. However, there are reports from Denmark to South Africa, as well as from the Mediterranean and the Black Sea. Remark The species C. lobata differs from C. celata by several external morphological features, namely smaller and more abundant papillae, and thinner boring galleries. Additionally, C. lobata consistently possesses spirasters, while their presence in C. celata is only documented by Topsent (1900). However, given that C. celata is a species complex (Xavier et al., 2010) in dire need of taxonomic studies, and as spirasters can be rare in specimens of C. lobata, especially in massive morphotypes, it is possible that many specimens identified as C. celata in the past might actually belong to C. lobata.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15185573
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cliona lobata Hancock 1849

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

Cliona lobata Hancock 1849

article en

Abstract

Cliona lobata Hancock, 1849 Cliona lobata Hancock 1849: 341–342, pl. XII fig. 4, 8. Cliona lobata – Alander 1942: 80. ? Cliona howsei Hancock, 1849 – Levinsen 1893: 415 fig. 27. Material examined (2 specimens) SWEDEN • 1 spec.; 57.3042° N, 11.9321° E; 51– 49 m depth; 31 May 2007; Artprojektets Skagerrak-inventering leg. [KA68]; dredge; P082-111026-1; voucher: GNM Porifera 554 • 1 spec.; 58.1352° N, 11.2512° E; 51–49 m depth; 27 Aug. 2007; Artprojektets Skagerrak-inventering leg. [SK67]; dredge; P082-111026-2; voucher: GNM Porifera 555. Description The specimens had a boring morphology growing in shells, but papillae protruding from them. The colour in situ is unknown and light yellow when preserved in ethanol. Skeleton The skeleton is composed of megascleres, which are tylostyles measuring 230–350×7.5 µm (N=4), and spirasters as microscleres, which may be rare in some individuals, measuring 12.5–17.5µm (N=2) in length. Ecology and distribution The type locality is in the English Channel. However, there are reports from Denmark to South Africa, as well as from the Mediterranean and the Black Sea. Remark The species C. lobata differs from C. celata by several external morphological features, namely smaller and more abundant papillae, and thinner boring galleries. Additionally, C. lobata consistently possesses spirasters, while their presence in C. celata is only documented by Topsent (1900). However, given that C. celata is a species complex (Xavier et al., 2010) in dire need of taxonomic studies, and as spirasters can be rare in specimens of C. lobata, especially in massive morphotypes, it is possible that many specimens identified as C. celata in the past might actually belong to C. lobata.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Uppsala University (SE)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.