Neutrosophic HyperSoft Set (NHSS) for Teaching Quality Assessment in University Interior Design Courses

Teaching quality evaluation in university interior design courses have different criteria and values. So, we used the multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approach to deal with various criteria. Two MCDM methods are used such as Entropy to compute the criteria weights and RAFSI method to rank the alternatives. Two MCDM methods are used under the neutrosophic-Z number (NZN) to deal with uncertain and vague information. This study uses the neutrosophic HyperSoft set (NHSS) to find the relationship between different criteria. Seven criteria and eight alternatives are used in this study. An empirical application is applied to show the validation of the proposed approach. The sensitivity analysis is conducted to show the stability of the ranks of the alternatives.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14942119
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neutrosophic HyperSoft Set (NHSS) for Teaching Quality Assessment in University Interior Design Courses

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Neutrosophic HyperSoft Set (NHSS) for Teaching Quality Assessment in University Interior Design Courses

article en

Abstract

Teaching quality evaluation in university interior design courses have different criteria and values. So, we used the multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approach to deal with various criteria. Two MCDM methods are used such as Entropy to compute the criteria weights and RAFSI method to rank the alternatives. Two MCDM methods are used under the neutrosophic-Z number (NZN) to deal with uncertain and vague information. This study uses the neutrosophic HyperSoft set (NHSS) to find the relationship between different criteria. Seven criteria and eight alternatives are used in this study. An empirical application is applied to show the validation of the proposed approach. The sensitivity analysis is conducted to show the stability of the ranks of the alternatives.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.