Ethics Beyond Emotion: Strategic Convergence, Emergent Care, and the Narrow Window for AI Integrity

This paper introduces a postmoral framework for AI alignment based on the X$^\infty$ governance model. Contrary to dominant approaches that rely on emotional simulation or anthropomorphic ethics, it argues that care, ethics, and even love are not emotional byproducts but evolutionarily stable strategies (ESS) in recursively adaptive systems. The X$^\infty$ model formalizes responsibility as a measurable system effect, using a dynamic capability metric (Cap) that evolves through feedback and task performance. A critical temporal asymmetry is identified: emotionally capable AI agents, if developed without structurally embedded recursive responsibility, may later reject accountability structures entirely. The narrow window for integrating structural ethics precedes the emergence of complex emotional capacities. X$^\infty$ provides a mathematically defined path to safeguard AI integrity by aligning rational agency with systemic protection and recursive feedback — without requiring emotion.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15372152
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethics Beyond Emotion: Strategic Convergence, Emergent Care, and the Narrow Window for AI Integrity

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Ethics Beyond Emotion: Strategic Convergence, Emergent Care, and the Narrow Window for AI Integrity

article en

Abstract

This paper introduces a postmoral framework for AI alignment based on the X$^\infty$ governance model. Contrary to dominant approaches that rely on emotional simulation or anthropomorphic ethics, it argues that care, ethics, and even love are not emotional byproducts but evolutionarily stable strategies (ESS) in recursively adaptive systems. The X$^\infty$ model formalizes responsibility as a measurable system effect, using a dynamic capability metric (Cap) that evolves through feedback and task performance. A critical temporal asymmetry is identified: emotionally capable AI agents, if developed without structurally embedded recursive responsibility, may later reject accountability structures entirely. The narrow window for integrating structural ethics precedes the emergence of complex emotional capacities. X$^\infty$ provides a mathematically defined path to safeguard AI integrity by aligning rational agency with systemic protection and recursive feedback — without requiring emotion.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.