Comparison of Clinico- Demographic and Lung Spirometry Profile Between Non- Smoker versus Smoker COPD Patients

Introduction: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with smoking being the leading risk factor. However, non-smokers, particularly those exposed to biomass fuel, occupational hazards, or second-hand smoke, also contribute significantly to the disease burden. This study aims to compare the clinico-demographic and lung spirometry profiles between non-smoker and smoker COPD patients, highlighting the differences in risk factors, symptom presentation, and disease severity. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care center, including 200 COPD patients diagnosed through clinical features and spirometry. Patients were divided into two groups: smokers and non-smokers. Data on clinical symptoms, demographic factors, and lung function (via spirometry and GOLD classification) were collected. Non-smokers were those exposed to biomass or occupational risks, while smokers had a smoking history of at least 10 pack-years. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the two groups, with a p-value <0.05 considered significant. Results: In our study, 67% of the COPD patients were smokers, and 33% were non-smokers. The majority of smokers (99 out of 134) were classified as GOLD 3, with 17 in GOLD 4, while non-smokers were primarily in GOLD 3 (39 out of 66), with only 2 in GOLD 4 (p < 0.001). Non-smokers had significant risk factors like biofuel exposure (71.2%), second-hand smoke (15.2%), and underlying causes (13.6%). Smokers experienced more severe symptoms, including cough (102 out of 134), sputum (73), and chest tightness (42), compared to non-smokers (p-values ranging from 0.011 to 0.034). Additionally, 116 smokers had 3-5 acute exacerbations compared to 44 non-smokers (p = 0.001). Smokers also had a higher mean CAT score (31.43 ± 4.204) than non-smokers (29.17 ± 4.508, p = 0.001). Lastly, socioeconomic status showed a significant difference, with most smokers from lower classes (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our study demonstrates significant differences between smoker and non-smoker COPD patients, with smokers exhibiting more severe lung function impairment, higher symptom burden, and frequent exacerbations. Non-smokers were primarily affected by biofuel exposure and environmental factors, indicating the need for targeted interventions in both groups to manage and prevent COPD.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14536230
Primary Topic
MicroRNA in disease regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Clinico- Demographic and Lung Spirometry Profile Between Non- Smoker versus Smoker COPD Patients

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
MicroRNA in disease regulation
article

Comparison of Clinico- Demographic and Lung Spirometry Profile Between Non- Smoker versus Smoker COPD Patients

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with smoking being the leading risk factor. However, non-smokers, particularly those exposed to biomass fuel, occupational hazards, or second-hand smoke, also contribute significantly to the disease burden. This study aims to compare the clinico-demographic and lung spirometry profiles between non-smoker and smoker COPD patients, highlighting the differences in risk factors, symptom presentation, and disease severity. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care center, including 200 COPD patients diagnosed through clinical features and spirometry. Patients were divided into two groups: smokers and non-smokers. Data on clinical symptoms, demographic factors, and lung function (via spirometry and GOLD classification) were collected. Non-smokers were those exposed to biomass or occupational risks, while smokers had a smoking history of at least 10 pack-years. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the two groups, with a p-value <0.05 considered significant. Results: In our study, 67% of the COPD patients were smokers, and 33% were non-smokers. The majority of smokers (99 out of 134) were classified as GOLD 3, with 17 in GOLD 4, while non-smokers were primarily in GOLD 3 (39 out of 66), with only 2 in GOLD 4 (p < 0.001). Non-smokers had significant risk factors like biofuel exposure (71.2%), second-hand smoke (15.2%), and underlying causes (13.6%). Smokers experienced more severe symptoms, including cough (102 out of 134), sputum (73), and chest tightness (42), compared to non-smokers (p-values ranging from 0.011 to 0.034). Additionally, 116 smokers had 3-5 acute exacerbations compared to 44 non-smokers (p = 0.001). Smokers also had a higher mean CAT score (31.43 ± 4.204) than non-smokers (29.17 ± 4.508, p = 0.001). Lastly, socioeconomic status showed a significant difference, with most smokers from lower classes (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our study demonstrates significant differences between smoker and non-smoker COPD patients, with smokers exhibiting more severe lung function impairment, higher symptom burden, and frequent exacerbations. Non-smokers were primarily affected by biofuel exposure and environmental factors, indicating the need for targeted interventions in both groups to manage and prevent COPD.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Government Medical College (IN), National Forensic Sciences University (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
MicroRNA in disease regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.