Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Proses Penyelesaian Pemilu Terkait Hasil Pemilu

In accordance with the ruling of the Constitutional Court under Decision Number 97/PUU-XI/2013, the Constitutional Court no longer holds the authority to adjudicate disputes concerning the outcomes of direct local elections, as the provisions of Article 236C of Law Number 12 of 2008 are inconsistent with the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Article 157 paragraph (1) of Law Number 8 of 2015 specifies that the resolution of disputes over regional election results falls directly within the purview of a specialized judicial entity. However, prior to the establishment of such a specialized judicial entity, the Constitutional Court retained the authority to adjudicate disputes over the outcomes of direct regional elections. The authority of the Constitutional Court is a temporary constitutional mandate to address legal vacuums. Hence, lawmakers must promptly establish a specialized judicial entity endowed with the authority to resolve disputes over the outcomes of direct regional elections.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14560685
Primary Topic
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Proses Penyelesaian Pemilu Terkait Hasil Pemilu

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
article

Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Proses Penyelesaian Pemilu Terkait Hasil Pemilu

article en

Abstract

In accordance with the ruling of the Constitutional Court under Decision Number 97/PUU-XI/2013, the Constitutional Court no longer holds the authority to adjudicate disputes concerning the outcomes of direct local elections, as the provisions of Article 236C of Law Number 12 of 2008 are inconsistent with the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Article 157 paragraph (1) of Law Number 8 of 2015 specifies that the resolution of disputes over regional election results falls directly within the purview of a specialized judicial entity. However, prior to the establishment of such a specialized judicial entity, the Constitutional Court retained the authority to adjudicate disputes over the outcomes of direct regional elections. The authority of the Constitutional Court is a temporary constitutional mandate to address legal vacuums. Hence, lawmakers must promptly establish a specialized judicial entity endowed with the authority to resolve disputes over the outcomes of direct regional elections.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Tarumanagara University (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.