Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara

Resolving disputes about the jurisdiction of governmental entities assigned powers under the 1945 Constitution is an ongoing responsibility of the Constitutional Court. Even in constitutional law, the phrase "state institution" might mean different things to different people. insufficient knowledge on the state entities that would be vested with the power to resolve disputes regarding the jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court. Given that they are discussed broadly, there are more than two Indonesian state institutions. The difficulty of resolving disagreements regarding the institutional authority of the Constitutional Court is the primary focus of this paper. Legal normative and conceptual research are the methods utilized. The complexity of resolving authority disputes involving state institutions, particularly the concept of state institutions and the optimization of processes and their resolution, is illustrated by the discussion's conclusion. In this particular instance, it would appear that judges of the Constitutional Court have significantly more discretion over which state institutions and individuals may be challenged in cases involving the power of state institutions, the Constitutional Court's judges are authorized to differentiate between subjectum litis and objectum litis according to Regulation 08/PMK/2006.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14288365
Primary Topic
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
article

Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara

article en

Abstract

Resolving disputes about the jurisdiction of governmental entities assigned powers under the 1945 Constitution is an ongoing responsibility of the Constitutional Court. Even in constitutional law, the phrase "state institution" might mean different things to different people. insufficient knowledge on the state entities that would be vested with the power to resolve disputes regarding the jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court. Given that they are discussed broadly, there are more than two Indonesian state institutions. The difficulty of resolving disagreements regarding the institutional authority of the Constitutional Court is the primary focus of this paper. Legal normative and conceptual research are the methods utilized. The complexity of resolving authority disputes involving state institutions, particularly the concept of state institutions and the optimization of processes and their resolution, is illustrated by the discussion's conclusion. In this particular instance, it would appear that judges of the Constitutional Court have significantly more discretion over which state institutions and individuals may be challenged in cases involving the power of state institutions, the Constitutional Court's judges are authorized to differentiate between subjectum litis and objectum litis according to Regulation 08/PMK/2006.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.