Expert Judgment Template Learning Outcomes

Instrument to gather the experts' opinions as described by Escobar Pérez and Cuervo-Martínez (2008). All experts were instructed to evaluate each scale indicator individually based on its definition. The dimensions assessed were adequacy (whether the indicators suffice to obtain the measurement of the LO according to its definition), clarity (whether the indicator is easily understood, and its syntax is appropriate), coherence (whether the indicator has a logical relationship with the LO being measured), and relevance (whether the indicator is essential or important and therefore should be included). To assess each indicator, the experts used a 4-point numerical scale (1 = Does not meet the criterion, 2 = Achieves minimal compliance with the indicator, 3 = Moderately meets the criterion, 4 = Meets the indicator at a high level). Escobar-Pérez, J., & Cuervo-Martínez, Á. (2008). Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: Una aproximación a su utilización. Avances En Medición, 6(2), 42–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32870/ap.v9n2.993