Mohd. Mahfooz Qureshi - Technology Law and the Credibility of Electronic Evidence: A Study Under the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

The rise of digital technology has fundamentally transformed legal proceedings, creating new challenges and opportunities in evidence law. The Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023, is a landmark legislative development in India, focusing on the admissibility and credibility of electronic evidence in the judicial system. This paper examines the provisions of the BSA, exploring how it redefines the role of electronic records as primary evidence and the measures put in place to ensure their authenticity and reliability. The BSA elevates electronic and digital records to the status of primary evidence, marking a shift from the traditional view where such records were considered secondary evidence. This change highlights the growing recognition of digital forms of evidence—such as emails, server logs, and multimedia files—as essential elements of legal cases. Section 61 of the BSA ensures that electronic records hold the same legal weight, validity, and enforceability as conventional documents, provided they meet the specific criteria outlined in Section 63. A key aspect of the BSA is its focus on maintaining the chain of custody and integrity of electronic evidence. The Act mandates that electronic records be accompanied by an authenticity certificate, signed by both the person responsible for the device and an expert. This dual-certification requirement aims to prevent tampering and ensure the reliability of the evidence presented in court. Moreover, the BSA includes provisions for expert testimony, permitting courts to rely on forensic analysts and IT specialists to interpret complex electronic evidence. This approach recognizes the need for specialized expertise in evaluating digital records and guarantees that such evidence is properly understood and assessed. However, the BSA's implementation faces certain challenges. Notably, the Act does not clearly define who qualifies as an expert capable of certifying the authenticity of electronic evidence. Furthermore, as technology evolves rapidly, there is a pressing need for continuous updates to the legal framework to address emerging issues in digital evidence handling. In conclusion, the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, represents a crucial step in modernizing India's evidence laws, adapting them to the digital era. By providing clear guidelines for the admissibility and credibility of electronic evidence, the BSA strengthens the integrity of legal proceedings and enhances confidence in the judicial system's handling of digital records. Nevertheless, ongoing efforts are necessary to address the challenges posed by rapid technological advancements and ensure the law remains effective and adaptable.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15291806
Primary Topic
Stress Responses and Cortisol
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mohd. Mahfooz Qureshi - Technology Law and the Credibility of Electronic Evidence: A Study Under the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Stress Responses and Cortisol
article

Mohd. Mahfooz Qureshi - Technology Law and the Credibility of Electronic Evidence: A Study Under the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

article en

Abstract

The rise of digital technology has fundamentally transformed legal proceedings, creating new challenges and opportunities in evidence law. The Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023, is a landmark legislative development in India, focusing on the admissibility and credibility of electronic evidence in the judicial system. This paper examines the provisions of the BSA, exploring how it redefines the role of electronic records as primary evidence and the measures put in place to ensure their authenticity and reliability. The BSA elevates electronic and digital records to the status of primary evidence, marking a shift from the traditional view where such records were considered secondary evidence. This change highlights the growing recognition of digital forms of evidence—such as emails, server logs, and multimedia files—as essential elements of legal cases. Section 61 of the BSA ensures that electronic records hold the same legal weight, validity, and enforceability as conventional documents, provided they meet the specific criteria outlined in Section 63. A key aspect of the BSA is its focus on maintaining the chain of custody and integrity of electronic evidence. The Act mandates that electronic records be accompanied by an authenticity certificate, signed by both the person responsible for the device and an expert. This dual-certification requirement aims to prevent tampering and ensure the reliability of the evidence presented in court. Moreover, the BSA includes provisions for expert testimony, permitting courts to rely on forensic analysts and IT specialists to interpret complex electronic evidence. This approach recognizes the need for specialized expertise in evaluating digital records and guarantees that such evidence is properly understood and assessed. However, the BSA's implementation faces certain challenges. Notably, the Act does not clearly define who qualifies as an expert capable of certifying the authenticity of electronic evidence. Furthermore, as technology evolves rapidly, there is a pressing need for continuous updates to the legal framework to address emerging issues in digital evidence handling. In conclusion, the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, represents a crucial step in modernizing India's evidence laws, adapting them to the digital era. By providing clear guidelines for the admissibility and credibility of electronic evidence, the BSA strengthens the integrity of legal proceedings and enhances confidence in the judicial system's handling of digital records. Nevertheless, ongoing efforts are necessary to address the challenges posed by rapid technological advancements and ensure the law remains effective and adaptable.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Stress Responses and Cortisol
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.