A Comparative Clinical Study of Efficacy of 0.75% Isobaric Ropivacaine versus 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Elective Caesarean Section under Spinal Anesthesia

Background: The use of neuraxial anesthesia, such as spinal anesthesia, has become increasingly popular for elective cesarean sections. Local anesthetics are crucial in providing effective pain relief during these procedures. Ropivacaine and bupivacaine are two commonly used local anesthetics with different properties. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine and 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in providing spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean sections. The current study aimed to compare the clinical effects of 2ml of 0.75% intrathecal isobaric Ropivacaine with 2ml of 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine for elective cesarean section. Methods: N=100 parturients belonging to ASA physical status I & II scheduled for elective cesarean section were randomly selected for the study and were divided into two groups of 30 each Group B patient received 2ml of 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine intrathecally. Group R patients received 2ml of 0.75% isobaric Ropivacaine intrathecally Onset and duration of sensory block, onset and duration of motor block, maximum height of sensory block, quality of anesthesia, and time of request for analgesia, hemodynamic parameters and adverse effects if any were studied. Results: There was no significant difference in the onset of sensory block at T8 between the two groups: 158.40±41.89 sec with Bupivacaine and 174.00±44.12 sec with Ropivacaine (P=0.073). Maximum sensory height was higher in group R (T2-T6) than in group B (T4-T6) (P<0.001). The duration of sensory block was similar between groups, while motor block onset was faster in group B (P<0.001). Motor block duration was longer in group B (P<0.001). Analgesia request time, hemodynamic parameters, and side effects were comparable. Conclusion: Ropivacaine 15 mg (2 ml of 0.75% isobaric Ropivacaine) provides a comparable quality of sensory block but has a slower onset and significantly shorter duration of motor block compared to Bupivacaine.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14536157
Primary Topic
HIV Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Clinical Study of Efficacy of 0.75% Isobaric Ropivacaine versus 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Elective Caesarean Section under Spinal Anesthesia

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
HIV Research and Treatment
article

A Comparative Clinical Study of Efficacy of 0.75% Isobaric Ropivacaine versus 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Elective Caesarean Section under Spinal Anesthesia

article en

Abstract

Background: The use of neuraxial anesthesia, such as spinal anesthesia, has become increasingly popular for elective cesarean sections. Local anesthetics are crucial in providing effective pain relief during these procedures. Ropivacaine and bupivacaine are two commonly used local anesthetics with different properties. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine and 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in providing spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean sections. The current study aimed to compare the clinical effects of 2ml of 0.75% intrathecal isobaric Ropivacaine with 2ml of 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine for elective cesarean section. Methods: N=100 parturients belonging to ASA physical status I & II scheduled for elective cesarean section were randomly selected for the study and were divided into two groups of 30 each Group B patient received 2ml of 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine intrathecally. Group R patients received 2ml of 0.75% isobaric Ropivacaine intrathecally Onset and duration of sensory block, onset and duration of motor block, maximum height of sensory block, quality of anesthesia, and time of request for analgesia, hemodynamic parameters and adverse effects if any were studied. Results: There was no significant difference in the onset of sensory block at T8 between the two groups: 158.40±41.89 sec with Bupivacaine and 174.00±44.12 sec with Ropivacaine (P=0.073). Maximum sensory height was higher in group R (T2-T6) than in group B (T4-T6) (P<0.001). The duration of sensory block was similar between groups, while motor block onset was faster in group B (P<0.001). Motor block duration was longer in group B (P<0.001). Analgesia request time, hemodynamic parameters, and side effects were comparable. Conclusion: Ropivacaine 15 mg (2 ml of 0.75% isobaric Ropivacaine) provides a comparable quality of sensory block but has a slower onset and significantly shorter duration of motor block compared to Bupivacaine.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Osmania Medical College (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
HIV Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.