Siphonaria sowerbyi Michelin 1832

Siphonaria sowerbyi Michelin, 1832 Siphonaria sowerbyi Michelin 1832: unpaginated, pl. 17 (without type locality).— Anton 1838: 26; Hanley 1858b: 152; Paetel 1889: 429; Hubendick 1946: 69; White & Dayrat 2012: 68. Taxonomic remarks. The original description and original figure of Michelin (1832) do not provide enough detail to resolve the identity of this species. No type specimen(s) are known to exist (Philippe Bouchet; pers. comm.).While the original figure in Michelin (1832: pl. 17) matches the features of the atra group, particularly that of S. atra and S. alba, this species remains indeterminable. Hubendick (1946: 69) incorrectly rejected S. sowerbyi as a nomen nudum (followed by White & Dayrat, 2012: 68). Morrison (1972: 56–58) treated S. sowerbyi Michelin, 1832, S. sowerbyi Guerin, 1832 and S. sowerbyi Michelin,1868 as synonyms of S. laciniosa based on similarity in shell form and ‘common reproductive development’. These synonymies are not accepted here. This nominal species remains a nomen dubium.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14989395
Primary Topic
Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Siphonaria sowerbyi Michelin 1832

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
article

Siphonaria sowerbyi Michelin 1832

article en

Abstract

Siphonaria sowerbyi Michelin, 1832 Siphonaria sowerbyi Michelin 1832: unpaginated, pl. 17 (without type locality).— Anton 1838: 26; Hanley 1858b: 152; Paetel 1889: 429; Hubendick 1946: 69; White & Dayrat 2012: 68. Taxonomic remarks. The original description and original figure of Michelin (1832) do not provide enough detail to resolve the identity of this species. No type specimen(s) are known to exist (Philippe Bouchet; pers. comm.).While the original figure in Michelin (1832: pl. 17) matches the features of the atra group, particularly that of S. atra and S. alba, this species remains indeterminable. Hubendick (1946: 69) incorrectly rejected S. sowerbyi as a nomen nudum (followed by White & Dayrat, 2012: 68). Morrison (1972: 56–58) treated S. sowerbyi Michelin, 1832, S. sowerbyi Guerin, 1832 and S. sowerbyi Michelin,1868 as synonyms of S. laciniosa based on similarity in shell form and ‘common reproductive development’. These synonymies are not accepted here. This nominal species remains a nomen dubium.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Australian Museum (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.