Experimental Study of Oil Recovery Using Gum Arabic and Guar Gum Polymer

Tertiary recovery methods, commonly known as Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) techniques, are employed when primary and secondary recovery methods become less effective. This study investigates the impact of two natural polymers, Guar Gum and Gum Arabic, on medium crude oil production to assess their recovery efficiency and suitability for light oil recovery. Core flooding experiments were conducted in two stages: water flooding, followed by polymer flooding, with 2 pore volumes (PV) of each polymer. Both polymers were formulated to have identical viscosities to ensure fair comparison. Oil recovery was measured at each stage to evaluate the polymers' performance. The results showed that both polymers enhanced oil recovery, with Guar Gum outperforming Gum Arabic. Guar Gum increased recovery by 42.4%, while Gum Arabic achieved 30.8%. These findings indicate that Guar Gum is a more effective polymer for improving oil recovery, particularly in light to medium crude oil reservoirs.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14565590
Primary Topic
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental Study of Oil Recovery Using Gum Arabic and Guar Gum Polymer

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
article

Experimental Study of Oil Recovery Using Gum Arabic and Guar Gum Polymer

article en

Abstract

Tertiary recovery methods, commonly known as Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) techniques, are employed when primary and secondary recovery methods become less effective. This study investigates the impact of two natural polymers, Guar Gum and Gum Arabic, on medium crude oil production to assess their recovery efficiency and suitability for light oil recovery. Core flooding experiments were conducted in two stages: water flooding, followed by polymer flooding, with 2 pore volumes (PV) of each polymer. Both polymers were formulated to have identical viscosities to ensure fair comparison. Oil recovery was measured at each stage to evaluate the polymers' performance. The results showed that both polymers enhanced oil recovery, with Guar Gum outperforming Gum Arabic. Guar Gum increased recovery by 42.4%, while Gum Arabic achieved 30.8%. These findings indicate that Guar Gum is a more effective polymer for improving oil recovery, particularly in light to medium crude oil reservoirs.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Benin (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.