Comparative Study of Ropivacaine 0.75% and Levobupivacaine 0.5% in Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Plexus Block for Elective Upper Limb Surgeries

Background: Axillary plexus block is a common technique for upper limb surgeries, providing adequate analgesia and muscle relaxation. Ropivacaine and levobupivacaine are widely used local anaesthetics, with differences in onset time, duration of the block, and postoperative analgesia. Aim and Objective: To compare the efficacy of ropivacaine with 0.75% and levobupivacaine with 0.5% in ultrasound-guided axillary plexus block. This comparison is crucial for understanding the differences in onset time, duration of the block, and postoperative analgesia between these two widely used local anaesthetics. Materials and Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted at SVBP Hospital, affiliated with LLRM Medical College, Meerut, involving 80 patients aged 18-65 with ASA physical status I and II. Patients were randomly assigned to Group A (Ropivacaine 0.75%, 25 ml) and Group B (Levobupivacaine 0.5%, 25 ml). The primary outcomes included the onset and duration of sensory and motor blocks. Secondary outcomes were postoperative analgesia, hemodynamic parameters, and complications. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20.0, with a p-value of <0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: The mean onset time for sensory block was significantly faster in Group A (7.92 ± 1.01 min) compared to Group B (10.35 ± 1.17 min, p = 0.011). Similarly, motor block onset was faster in Group A (9.10 ± 0.87 min) than in Group B (11.27 ± 1.11 min, p = 0.005). The duration of the sensory block was shorter in Group A (9.21 ± 0.87 hrs) compared to Group B (12.25 ± 1.20 hrs, p = 0.032). Motor block duration was also shorter in Group A (8.54 ± 0.87 hrs) than in Group B (11.41 ± 1.17 hrs, p = 0.023). Postoperative analgesia lasted longer in Group B (12.93 ± 1.08 hrs) compared to Group A (9.93 ± 0.86 hrs, p = 0.038). Two patients in Group A experienced nausea and vomiting, while no complications were observed in Group B. Conclusion: Ropivacaine 0.75% provides a faster onset of sensory and motor blocks, while Levobupivacaine 0.5% offers a longer duration of both blocks and postoperative analgesia. Both agents were well-tolerated, with minimal complications. The choice between these two anaesthetics should be guided by the clinical scenario, depending on whether a faster onset or longer duration of block is required.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13904638
Primary Topic
Genetic diversity and population structure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Ropivacaine 0.75% and Levobupivacaine 0.5% in Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Plexus Block for Elective Upper Limb Surgeries

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Genetic diversity and population structure
article

Comparative Study of Ropivacaine 0.75% and Levobupivacaine 0.5% in Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Plexus Block for Elective Upper Limb Surgeries

article en

Abstract

Background: Axillary plexus block is a common technique for upper limb surgeries, providing adequate analgesia and muscle relaxation. Ropivacaine and levobupivacaine are widely used local anaesthetics, with differences in onset time, duration of the block, and postoperative analgesia. Aim and Objective: To compare the efficacy of ropivacaine with 0.75% and levobupivacaine with 0.5% in ultrasound-guided axillary plexus block. This comparison is crucial for understanding the differences in onset time, duration of the block, and postoperative analgesia between these two widely used local anaesthetics. Materials and Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted at SVBP Hospital, affiliated with LLRM Medical College, Meerut, involving 80 patients aged 18-65 with ASA physical status I and II. Patients were randomly assigned to Group A (Ropivacaine 0.75%, 25 ml) and Group B (Levobupivacaine 0.5%, 25 ml). The primary outcomes included the onset and duration of sensory and motor blocks. Secondary outcomes were postoperative analgesia, hemodynamic parameters, and complications. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20.0, with a p-value of <0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: The mean onset time for sensory block was significantly faster in Group A (7.92 ± 1.01 min) compared to Group B (10.35 ± 1.17 min, p = 0.011). Similarly, motor block onset was faster in Group A (9.10 ± 0.87 min) than in Group B (11.27 ± 1.11 min, p = 0.005). The duration of the sensory block was shorter in Group A (9.21 ± 0.87 hrs) compared to Group B (12.25 ± 1.20 hrs, p = 0.032). Motor block duration was also shorter in Group A (8.54 ± 0.87 hrs) than in Group B (11.41 ± 1.17 hrs, p = 0.023). Postoperative analgesia lasted longer in Group B (12.93 ± 1.08 hrs) compared to Group A (9.93 ± 0.86 hrs, p = 0.038). Two patients in Group A experienced nausea and vomiting, while no complications were observed in Group B. Conclusion: Ropivacaine 0.75% provides a faster onset of sensory and motor blocks, while Levobupivacaine 0.5% offers a longer duration of both blocks and postoperative analgesia. Both agents were well-tolerated, with minimal complications. The choice between these two anaesthetics should be guided by the clinical scenario, depending on whether a faster onset or longer duration of block is required.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Lala Lajpat Rai Memorial Medical College (IN), Government Medical College (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Genetic diversity and population structure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.