A linguistic analysis of grammatical cohesion devices in discussion sections of undergraduate theses

This study aims (a) to identify the types of grammatical cohesion used in the discussion sections of undergraduate theses and (b) to quantify the usage of these cohesive devices by EFL students in Aceh, Indonesia. Data were collected using an analytical sheet to identify instances of grammatical cohesion. The analysis revealed three types of grammatical cohesion in the discussion sections, with a total of 561 cohesive devices identified. The theses demonstrate a strong dependence on conjunctions (48.66%) and references (42.78%). Meanwhile, substitution is employed less often (8.56%), and ellipsis is entirely absent. Conjunctions and reference were the most frequently used due to their role in linking ideas and maintaining coherence, whereas substitutions were the least used because they are less effective for connecting larger segments of text. The findings of this study highlight students’ understanding of the importance of grammatical cohesion as it helps ensure logical and clear sentence flow in academic writing.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13956442
Primary Topic
Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A linguistic analysis of grammatical cohesion devices in discussion sections of undergraduate theses

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement
article

A linguistic analysis of grammatical cohesion devices in discussion sections of undergraduate theses

article en

Abstract

This study aims (a) to identify the types of grammatical cohesion used in the discussion sections of undergraduate theses and (b) to quantify the usage of these cohesive devices by EFL students in Aceh, Indonesia. Data were collected using an analytical sheet to identify instances of grammatical cohesion. The analysis revealed three types of grammatical cohesion in the discussion sections, with a total of 561 cohesive devices identified. The theses demonstrate a strong dependence on conjunctions (48.66%) and references (42.78%). Meanwhile, substitution is employed less often (8.56%), and ellipsis is entirely absent. Conjunctions and reference were the most frequently used due to their role in linking ideas and maintaining coherence, whereas substitutions were the least used because they are less effective for connecting larger segments of text. The findings of this study highlight students’ understanding of the importance of grammatical cohesion as it helps ensure logical and clear sentence flow in academic writing.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A linguistic analysis of grammatical cohesion devices in discussion sections of undergraduate theses · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS