DREPTUL LA SATISFACȚIE ECHITABILĂ ÎN LUMINA CONVENȚIEI EUROPENE A DREPTURILOR OMULUI: ANALIZA REGLEMENTĂRILOR AMIABILE ȘI DECLARAȚIILOR UNILATERALE

Summary. This article examines how the European Court of Human Rights facilitates amicable settlements and utilizes unilateral declarations to address violations of fundamental rights. Thisprocess allows the Court to support the resolution of disputes in a manner that respects fundamentalrights, ensuring that amicable agreements are consistent with human rights principles. The articlealso explores how, in situations where amicable settlements are not feasible, unilateral declarationsenable states to acknowledge violations and provide compensation, emphasizing the importance oftransparency and public procedures. By analyzing various case studies from the Court’s jurisprudence, the article highlights the effectiveness and limitations of these mechanisms in addressing bothindividual and systemic issues related to the protection of fundamental rights.Key words: The European Court of Human Rights, amicable settlements, unilateral declarations, fundamental rights, compensation, confidential procedures, transparency, jurisprudence.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13756375
Primary Topic
Immune Response and Inflammation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DREPTUL LA SATISFACȚIE ECHITABILĂ ÎN LUMINA CONVENȚIEI EUROPENE A DREPTURILOR OMULUI: ANALIZA REGLEMENTĂRILOR AMIABILE ȘI DECLARAȚIILOR UNILATERALE

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Immune Response and Inflammation
article

DREPTUL LA SATISFACȚIE ECHITABILĂ ÎN LUMINA CONVENȚIEI EUROPENE A DREPTURILOR OMULUI: ANALIZA REGLEMENTĂRILOR AMIABILE ȘI DECLARAȚIILOR UNILATERALE

article en

Abstract

Summary. This article examines how the European Court of Human Rights facilitates amicable settlements and utilizes unilateral declarations to address violations of fundamental rights. Thisprocess allows the Court to support the resolution of disputes in a manner that respects fundamentalrights, ensuring that amicable agreements are consistent with human rights principles. The articlealso explores how, in situations where amicable settlements are not feasible, unilateral declarationsenable states to acknowledge violations and provide compensation, emphasizing the importance oftransparency and public procedures. By analyzing various case studies from the Court’s jurisprudence, the article highlights the effectiveness and limitations of these mechanisms in addressing bothindividual and systemic issues related to the protection of fundamental rights.Key words: The European Court of Human Rights, amicable settlements, unilateral declarations, fundamental rights, compensation, confidential procedures, transparency, jurisprudence.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Immune Response and Inflammation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.