Antisocial Personality Disorder and Legal Responsibility: A Systematic Review of the Evidence

ABSTRACT This article presents a systematic review on the legal responsibility of individuals diagnosed with Antisocial Personality Disorder from 2018 to 2024. In recent years, a debate has been maintained on the legal treatment of psychiatric disorders, including personality disorders, due to the complexity in managing their imputability in the legal system. The PRISMA model criteria were used to review and select studies relevant to this objective in academic databases. The results show that there is evidence of alterations at the neuroanatomical level that may affect the volitional capacity of people with APD, resulting in poor impulse control. However, some authors agree that, despite these alterations, individuals with this diagnosis are fully aware of their actions and their consequences when committing a crime, so this diagnosis would not necessarily constitute a reason for mitigation of their imputability. This article highlights the importance of continuing to develop theory and evaluation methods to establish adequate legal treatment.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13821381
Primary Topic
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Antisocial Personality Disorder and Legal Responsibility: A Systematic Review of the Evidence

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
article

Antisocial Personality Disorder and Legal Responsibility: A Systematic Review of the Evidence

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article presents a systematic review on the legal responsibility of individuals diagnosed with Antisocial Personality Disorder from 2018 to 2024. In recent years, a debate has been maintained on the legal treatment of psychiatric disorders, including personality disorders, due to the complexity in managing their imputability in the legal system. The PRISMA model criteria were used to review and select studies relevant to this objective in academic databases. The results show that there is evidence of alterations at the neuroanatomical level that may affect the volitional capacity of people with APD, resulting in poor impulse control. However, some authors agree that, despite these alterations, individuals with this diagnosis are fully aware of their actions and their consequences when committing a crime, so this diagnosis would not necessarily constitute a reason for mitigation of their imputability. This article highlights the importance of continuing to develop theory and evaluation methods to establish adequate legal treatment.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Cuenca (EC)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.