GOVERNANCE OF BARGAINING LEVELS AND BARGAINING COORDINATION

Abstract This article examines bargaining levels and coordination for collective bargaining in the public service in Botswana. Bargaining level coordination ensure that levels and bargaining units are integrated to harmonise the public service. To understand levels and coordination better the article explored how single and multi-employer bargaining relates to bargaining levels and coordination. Corporatism theory was incorporated to understand bargaining levels and coordination. The study used an Exploratory-Descriptive Qualitative (EDQ) research design. Fifteen participants were purposively selected form the public service and interviewed face to face. It was evident that the public service in Botswana does not have pre-established criteria for bargaining levels, coordination, favourability principle and derogation. The present analysis demonstrates that there is a hierarchical coordination of bargaining despite the ambiguity surrounding the bargaining levels. It was also evident that, due to the lack of public service bargaining councils, bargaining coordination has been challenge. Currently, there is no single bargaining council in Botswana. Establishing negotiating councils is crucial for the parties engaged in negotiations, as it will facilitate the establishment of mechanisms for coordinating negotiations, upholding the favorability principle, and ensure that all bargaining levels and units are well-aligned. To guarantee that bargaining levels and units are well-aligned, statutes establishing bargaining councils should include provisions for coordination processes, the favorability principle, and derogation. Baccaro (2003) noted that hierarchy and democracy are significant ways of bargaining level coordination. In order to prevent the risk of arbitrary abuse, it is advised that choices pertaining to all of the above be made in advance. Laws should expressly outline the situations that allows for favourability principle and derogation. The study made, theoretical, methodological as well as practical contributions.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13994889
Primary Topic
Legal Issues in South Africa
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GOVERNANCE OF BARGAINING LEVELS AND BARGAINING COORDINATION

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Legal Issues in South Africa
article

GOVERNANCE OF BARGAINING LEVELS AND BARGAINING COORDINATION

article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines bargaining levels and coordination for collective bargaining in the public service in Botswana. Bargaining level coordination ensure that levels and bargaining units are integrated to harmonise the public service. To understand levels and coordination better the article explored how single and multi-employer bargaining relates to bargaining levels and coordination. Corporatism theory was incorporated to understand bargaining levels and coordination. The study used an Exploratory-Descriptive Qualitative (EDQ) research design. Fifteen participants were purposively selected form the public service and interviewed face to face. It was evident that the public service in Botswana does not have pre-established criteria for bargaining levels, coordination, favourability principle and derogation. The present analysis demonstrates that there is a hierarchical coordination of bargaining despite the ambiguity surrounding the bargaining levels. It was also evident that, due to the lack of public service bargaining councils, bargaining coordination has been challenge. Currently, there is no single bargaining council in Botswana. Establishing negotiating councils is crucial for the parties engaged in negotiations, as it will facilitate the establishment of mechanisms for coordinating negotiations, upholding the favorability principle, and ensure that all bargaining levels and units are well-aligned. To guarantee that bargaining levels and units are well-aligned, statutes establishing bargaining councils should include provisions for coordination processes, the favorability principle, and derogation. Baccaro (2003) noted that hierarchy and democracy are significant ways of bargaining level coordination. In order to prevent the risk of arbitrary abuse, it is advised that choices pertaining to all of the above be made in advance. Laws should expressly outline the situations that allows for favourability principle and derogation. The study made, theoretical, methodological as well as practical contributions.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Legal Issues in South Africa
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.