Time-efficient consultation hours in the department of gynecological endocrinology.

Background The aim was to conduct a benchmark pilot study to find the best practice for consultation hours in the field of gynecological endocrinology. Suitable benchmarking participants were found in China, Germany, Greece, and Switzerland. Specifically, the study aimed to find the most time-efficient and beneficial consultation type in gynecological endocrinology focused on menopause and whether a shorter face-to-face consultation correlates with lower patient satisfaction.Methods This was an observational study. To analyze the processes of all benchmarking participants three tools were used: a measurement of time needed for the different consultation types, a questionnaire for patients and one for physicians. The primary endpoint was the time measurement of first consultations. Secondary endpoints were the time measurements of follow-up consultations and phone consultations and patient satisfaction.Results The mean overall duration of a first consultation differed from 20.4 min to 39.7 min ( = 0.003), mainly based on differences of the mean time to acquire the patient history, 5.6 to 21.6 min ( < 0.001). The percentage of patients who felt they had enough time to discuss questions ranged from 70% to 100% ( < 0.001). The percentage of patients who felt fully understood by their physician ranged from 62.5% to 92% ( = 0.006). The duration of a first consultation did not correlate with patients feeling well consulted (r=-0.048, = 0.557).Conclusions A concise patient history that concentrates on the most relevant points can reduce the total consultation time. Reducing consultation time can be made without compromising how well patients feel consulted.

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2024-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/7378
Primary Topic
Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time-efficient consultation hours in the department of gynecological endocrinology.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics
article

Time-efficient consultation hours in the department of gynecological endocrinology.

article en

Abstract

Background The aim was to conduct a benchmark pilot study to find the best practice for consultation hours in the field of gynecological endocrinology. Suitable benchmarking participants were found in China, Germany, Greece, and Switzerland. Specifically, the study aimed to find the most time-efficient and beneficial consultation type in gynecological endocrinology focused on menopause and whether a shorter face-to-face consultation correlates with lower patient satisfaction.Methods This was an observational study. To analyze the processes of all benchmarking participants three tools were used: a measurement of time needed for the different consultation types, a questionnaire for patients and one for physicians. The primary endpoint was the time measurement of first consultations. Secondary endpoints were the time measurements of follow-up consultations and phone consultations and patient satisfaction.Results The mean overall duration of a first consultation differed from 20.4 min to 39.7 min ( = 0.003), mainly based on differences of the mean time to acquire the patient history, 5.6 to 21.6 min ( < 0.001). The percentage of patients who felt they had enough time to discuss questions ranged from 70% to 100% ( < 0.001). The percentage of patients who felt fully understood by their physician ranged from 62.5% to 92% ( = 0.006). The duration of a first consultation did not correlate with patients feeling well consulted (r=-0.048, = 0.557).Conclusions A concise patient history that concentrates on the most relevant points can reduce the total consultation time. Reducing consultation time can be made without compromising how well patients feel consulted.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.