Clinical outcomes among patients with affective and non-affective psychosis and the role of substance use

Substance use is common among individuals experiencing psychosis and has important implications for clinical outcomes, symptomatic course, and treatment considerations. While research has largely focused efforts towards understanding the impact of cannabis in this population, insufficient attention has been paid towards alcohol in the existing literature. In addition, conclusions about the impact of substance use on patients with psychosis may be limited given that most research includes patients with affective and non-affective psychosis. There is some debate in the literature regarding the clinical utility of this dichotomy and further exploration is warranted. The aims of the current study were to: 1) examine the differences and similarities between patients with affective and non-affective psychosis; and 2) investigate whether substance use differentially impacts patients diagnosed with affective or non-affective psychosis. Patients were recruited from an early psychosis intervention program in St. John’s, NL and were diagnosed with either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. Patients’ clinical characteristics (i.e., substance use, positive symptoms, overall functioning, illness severity, and overall improvement) were assessed at three time points: admission, 12 and 24 months. A significant interaction between diagnostic group and time was found and suggested that patients with schizophrenia tended to show greater levels of improvement over the course of 24 months compared to patients with bipolar disorder. Further, patients with schizophrenia who abused cannabis tended to improve over the same time while patients with bipolar disorder who abused cannabis tended to show a decline. The interaction between diagnostic group and time was not significant for positive symptoms, overall functioning, or illness severity. Patients with bipolar disorder were also rated as having higher overall levels of global functioning and lower levels of illness severity compared to patients with schizophrenia. Lastly, alcohol abuse was a significant predictor of various clinical outcomes, including overall functioning and illness severity. The current study highlights the clinical utility of the dichotomy between affective and non-affective psychosis, and the need to further examine the impact of substance use, particularly alcohol, in this population.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Memorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48336/txst-pj39
Primary Topic
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical outcomes among patients with affective and non-affective psychosis and the role of substance use

Memorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
article

Clinical outcomes among patients with affective and non-affective psychosis and the role of substance use

article en

Abstract

Substance use is common among individuals experiencing psychosis and has important implications for clinical outcomes, symptomatic course, and treatment considerations. While research has largely focused efforts towards understanding the impact of cannabis in this population, insufficient attention has been paid towards alcohol in the existing literature. In addition, conclusions about the impact of substance use on patients with psychosis may be limited given that most research includes patients with affective and non-affective psychosis. There is some debate in the literature regarding the clinical utility of this dichotomy and further exploration is warranted. The aims of the current study were to: 1) examine the differences and similarities between patients with affective and non-affective psychosis; and 2) investigate whether substance use differentially impacts patients diagnosed with affective or non-affective psychosis. Patients were recruited from an early psychosis intervention program in St. John’s, NL and were diagnosed with either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. Patients’ clinical characteristics (i.e., substance use, positive symptoms, overall functioning, illness severity, and overall improvement) were assessed at three time points: admission, 12 and 24 months. A significant interaction between diagnostic group and time was found and suggested that patients with schizophrenia tended to show greater levels of improvement over the course of 24 months compared to patients with bipolar disorder. Further, patients with schizophrenia who abused cannabis tended to improve over the same time while patients with bipolar disorder who abused cannabis tended to show a decline. The interaction between diagnostic group and time was not significant for positive symptoms, overall functioning, or illness severity. Patients with bipolar disorder were also rated as having higher overall levels of global functioning and lower levels of illness severity compared to patients with schizophrenia. Lastly, alcohol abuse was a significant predictor of various clinical outcomes, including overall functioning and illness severity. The current study highlights the clinical utility of the dichotomy between affective and non-affective psychosis, and the need to further examine the impact of substance use, particularly alcohol, in this population.

Memorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.