Twenty-four years of empirical research on trust in AI: a bibliometric review of trends, overlooked issues, and future directions

Trust is widely regarded as a critical component to building artificial intelligence (AI) systems that people will use and safely rely upon. As research in this area continues to evolve, it becomes imperative that the research community synchronizes its empirical efforts and aligns on the path toward effective knowledge creation. To lay the groundwork toward achieving this objective, we performed a comprehensive bibliometric analysis, supplemented with a qualitative content analysis of over two decades of empirical research measuring trust in AI, comprising 1'156 core articles and 36'306 cited articles across multiple disciplines. Our analysis reveals several "elephants in the room" pertaining to missing perspectives in global discussions on trust in AI, a lack of contextualized theoretical models and a reliance on exploratory methodologies. We highlight strategies for the empirical research community that are aimed at fostering an in-depth understanding of trust in AI.

Publication Details

Journal
Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000698140
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Twenty-four years of empirical research on trust in AI: a bibliometric review of trends, overlooked issues, and future directions

Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Twenty-four years of empirical research on trust in AI: a bibliometric review of trends, overlooked issues, and future directions

article en

Abstract

Trust is widely regarded as a critical component to building artificial intelligence (AI) systems that people will use and safely rely upon. As research in this area continues to evolve, it becomes imperative that the research community synchronizes its empirical efforts and aligns on the path toward effective knowledge creation. To lay the groundwork toward achieving this objective, we performed a comprehensive bibliometric analysis, supplemented with a qualitative content analysis of over two decades of empirical research measuring trust in AI, comprising 1'156 core articles and 36'306 cited articles across multiple disciplines. Our analysis reveals several "elephants in the room" pertaining to missing perspectives in global discussions on trust in AI, a lack of contextualized theoretical models and a reliance on exploratory methodologies. We highlight strategies for the empirical research community that are aimed at fostering an in-depth understanding of trust in AI.

Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Twenty-four years of empirical research on trust in AI: a bibliometric review of trends, overlooked issues, and future directions · Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS