Hybrid Simulation Tests of Real-Scale Squat Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall Specimens

Squat reinforced concrete shear walls usually have diagonal shear- or sliding shear-controlled behavior. Due to the lack of experimental data, there is uncertainty on how squat wall design parameters define their behavior modes. Two real-scale tests were conducted at ETH Zurich on specimens of equal geometry and reinforcement, but different axial load ratios (ALR), employing hybrid simulation techniques to apply recorded ground-motion excitation in a quasi-dynamic manner. Specimen HSW01 had an ALR of 4.02%, whereas the ALR for Specimen HSW02 was 8%. Specimen HSW01 failed in sliding shear, exhibited a quasi-ductile behavior, developed a peak resistance of 2,730 kN, and reached a displacement corresponding to a 3% drift ratio without losing the ability to carry its axial load. Specimen HSW02 failed in shear diagonal compression and lost the ability to carry its axial load at a horizontal displacement corresponding to a 2% drift ratio and a peak resistance of 3,360 kN. The crack patterns, crack width, and damage progression observed in both tests are presented. Finally, the results were compared with similar specimens tested using a displacement-driven incremental symmetric quasi-static cyclic test protocol. Hybrid simulations using recorded ground-motion excitation did not affect the failure mode of the specimens but allowed them to sustain larger displacements than those tested cyclically.

Publication Details

Journal
Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000722576
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid Simulation Tests of Real-Scale Squat Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall Specimens

Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

Hybrid Simulation Tests of Real-Scale Squat Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall Specimens

article en

Abstract

Squat reinforced concrete shear walls usually have diagonal shear- or sliding shear-controlled behavior. Due to the lack of experimental data, there is uncertainty on how squat wall design parameters define their behavior modes. Two real-scale tests were conducted at ETH Zurich on specimens of equal geometry and reinforcement, but different axial load ratios (ALR), employing hybrid simulation techniques to apply recorded ground-motion excitation in a quasi-dynamic manner. Specimen HSW01 had an ALR of 4.02%, whereas the ALR for Specimen HSW02 was 8%. Specimen HSW01 failed in sliding shear, exhibited a quasi-ductile behavior, developed a peak resistance of 2,730 kN, and reached a displacement corresponding to a 3% drift ratio without losing the ability to carry its axial load. Specimen HSW02 failed in shear diagonal compression and lost the ability to carry its axial load at a horizontal displacement corresponding to a 2% drift ratio and a peak resistance of 3,360 kN. The crack patterns, crack width, and damage progression observed in both tests are presented. Finally, the results were compared with similar specimens tested using a displacement-driven incremental symmetric quasi-static cyclic test protocol. Hybrid simulations using recorded ground-motion excitation did not affect the failure mode of the specimens but allowed them to sustain larger displacements than those tested cyclically.

Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.