Identification of Crashworthy Designs Combining Active Learning and the Solution Space Methodology

This study introduces a novel methodology for vehicle development under crashworthiness constraints. We propose coupling the solution space method (SSM) with active learning reliability (ALR) to map global requirements, i.e., safety requirements on the whole vehicle, to the design parameters associated with a component. To this purpose, we use a classifier to distinguish between the design that fulfills the requirements, the safe domain, and those that do not, the failure domain. This classifier is trained on finite element simulations, exploiting the learning strategies used by ALR to efficiently and precisely identify the border between the two domains and the information provided on these domains by the SSM. We then provide an exemplary application where the efficiency of the method is shown: the safe domain is identified with 270 samples and an average total error of 2.5%. The methodology we propose here is an efficient method to identify safe designs at a comparatively low computational budget. To the best of our knowledge, there is currently no methodology available that can identify regions in the design space that result in designs satisfying the local requirements set by the SSM due to the complexity and strong nonlinearity of crashworthiness simulations. The proposed coupling exploits the information of SSM and the capabilities of ALR to provide a fast mapping between the global requirements and the design parameters, which can, in turn, be made available to the designers to inexpensively evaluate the crashworthiness of new shapes and component features.

Publication Details

Journal
Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000710897
Primary Topic
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification of Crashworthy Designs Combining Active Learning and the Solution Space Methodology

Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
article

Identification of Crashworthy Designs Combining Active Learning and the Solution Space Methodology

article en

Abstract

This study introduces a novel methodology for vehicle development under crashworthiness constraints. We propose coupling the solution space method (SSM) with active learning reliability (ALR) to map global requirements, i.e., safety requirements on the whole vehicle, to the design parameters associated with a component. To this purpose, we use a classifier to distinguish between the design that fulfills the requirements, the safe domain, and those that do not, the failure domain. This classifier is trained on finite element simulations, exploiting the learning strategies used by ALR to efficiently and precisely identify the border between the two domains and the information provided on these domains by the SSM. We then provide an exemplary application where the efficiency of the method is shown: the safe domain is identified with 270 samples and an average total error of 2.5%. The methodology we propose here is an efficient method to identify safe designs at a comparatively low computational budget. To the best of our knowledge, there is currently no methodology available that can identify regions in the design space that result in designs satisfying the local requirements set by the SSM due to the complexity and strong nonlinearity of crashworthiness simulations. The proposed coupling exploits the information of SSM and the capabilities of ALR to provide a fast mapping between the global requirements and the design parameters, which can, in turn, be made available to the designers to inexpensively evaluate the crashworthiness of new shapes and component features.

Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.