Persisting Inequity: School Administrators’ Social Dominance Orientation and Disciplinary Practices

Empirical research has established that exclusionary discipline is applied to black students at a higher rate than white students for similar offenses, and that this disproportionality cannot be attributed to the severity or frequency of misconduct. Exclusionary discipline, which removes a student from the educational setting, poses significant challenges to academic and social well-being and introduces a host of proximal issues for black students. This dissertation draws upon Social Dominance Theory (SDT), which examines how beliefs aligned to existing hierarchies perpetuate discrimination and oppression, to explore how administrators' anti-egalitarian beliefs and disciplinary practices influence the disproportionate application of exclusionary discipline towards black students in a large urban school district. Using an ordinary least square regression model, this study investigated data collected from high school administrators regarding their anti-egalitarian attitudes and disciplinary practices to predict relationships with discipline disproportionality. Results indicated that administrators' anti-egalitarian attitudes positively correlated with the presence of exclusionary discipline gaps, particularly in the areas of alcohol, tobacco, and drug-related incidents, disruptive behavior, and bullying. Furthermore, disciplinary practices such as anti-suspension, preventative measures, and system approaches also showed significant correlations with exclusionary discipline gaps when controlling for anti-egalitarian attitudes. These findings suggest that disciplinary decisions are influenced by administrators' beliefs in maintaining social hierarchies, contributing to the disproportionate discipline of black students. The study highlights the need for education systems to address discipline disproportionality as a systemic issue rooted in power dynamics and social hierarchies. By recognizing the role of school administrators in perpetuating inequities, educational institutions can implement strategies to promote equity, inclusion, and improved outcomes for all students.

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Scholarship - UNLV (University of Nevada Reno)
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34917/37650839
Primary Topic
Education Discipline and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Persisting Inequity: School Administrators’ Social Dominance Orientation and Disciplinary Practices

Digital Scholarship - UNLV (University of Nevada Reno)
Education Discipline and Inequality
article

Persisting Inequity: School Administrators’ Social Dominance Orientation and Disciplinary Practices

article en

Abstract

Empirical research has established that exclusionary discipline is applied to black students at a higher rate than white students for similar offenses, and that this disproportionality cannot be attributed to the severity or frequency of misconduct. Exclusionary discipline, which removes a student from the educational setting, poses significant challenges to academic and social well-being and introduces a host of proximal issues for black students. This dissertation draws upon Social Dominance Theory (SDT), which examines how beliefs aligned to existing hierarchies perpetuate discrimination and oppression, to explore how administrators' anti-egalitarian beliefs and disciplinary practices influence the disproportionate application of exclusionary discipline towards black students in a large urban school district. Using an ordinary least square regression model, this study investigated data collected from high school administrators regarding their anti-egalitarian attitudes and disciplinary practices to predict relationships with discipline disproportionality. Results indicated that administrators' anti-egalitarian attitudes positively correlated with the presence of exclusionary discipline gaps, particularly in the areas of alcohol, tobacco, and drug-related incidents, disruptive behavior, and bullying. Furthermore, disciplinary practices such as anti-suspension, preventative measures, and system approaches also showed significant correlations with exclusionary discipline gaps when controlling for anti-egalitarian attitudes. These findings suggest that disciplinary decisions are influenced by administrators' beliefs in maintaining social hierarchies, contributing to the disproportionate discipline of black students. The study highlights the need for education systems to address discipline disproportionality as a systemic issue rooted in power dynamics and social hierarchies. By recognizing the role of school administrators in perpetuating inequities, educational institutions can implement strategies to promote equity, inclusion, and improved outcomes for all students.

Digital Scholarship - UNLV (University of Nevada Reno)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Education Discipline and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Persisting Inequity: School Administrators’ Social Dominance Orientation and Disciplinary Practices · Digital Scholarship - UNLV (University of Nevada Reno) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS