Mechanical Strength and Characteristics of Spent Foundry Admixed Concrete

This work is on the experimental study of the effects of spent foundry sand (SFS) and gum Arabic (GA) on concrete properties using a concrete mix proportion of 1: 1.7: 2.6 and a cement content of 357 kg/m3, water-cement (w/c) ratio of 0.5, and a GA dosage of 0.5 %. Six (6) levels of SFS replacements of 10 to 50 % were used and compared with the control concrete containing no SFS with and without 0.5 % GA. Analysis on the mechanical strength was performed using Minitab 18 Software. Also investigated were the hydration products using the XRD and SEM methods of analysis on the crushed concrete samples at the maximum strength (10 %). Some of the results of the investigation are that SFS and GA are compatible and can produce good quality concrete based on the statistical, XRD and SEM analysis. The dominant mineral oxides are CA, Si, Ag, Fe, C, K and Al with a very strong presence of Ca for concrete samples with both SFS and GA. These mineral oxides may have played substantial roles in the modification of the concrete samples.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Building Materials and Structures
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34118/jbms.v12i1.4134
Primary Topic
Materials Engineering and Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanical Strength and Characteristics of Spent Foundry Admixed Concrete

Journal of Building Materials and Structures
Materials Engineering and Processing
article

Mechanical Strength and Characteristics of Spent Foundry Admixed Concrete

article en

Abstract

This work is on the experimental study of the effects of spent foundry sand (SFS) and gum Arabic (GA) on concrete properties using a concrete mix proportion of 1: 1.7: 2.6 and a cement content of 357 kg/m3, water-cement (w/c) ratio of 0.5, and a GA dosage of 0.5 %. Six (6) levels of SFS replacements of 10 to 50 % were used and compared with the control concrete containing no SFS with and without 0.5 % GA. Analysis on the mechanical strength was performed using Minitab 18 Software. Also investigated were the hydration products using the XRD and SEM methods of analysis on the crushed concrete samples at the maximum strength (10 %). Some of the results of the investigation are that SFS and GA are compatible and can produce good quality concrete based on the statistical, XRD and SEM analysis. The dominant mineral oxides are CA, Si, Ag, Fe, C, K and Al with a very strong presence of Ca for concrete samples with both SFS and GA. These mineral oxides may have played substantial roles in the modification of the concrete samples.

Journal of Building Materials and StructuresVol. 12(1)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Materials Engineering and Processing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.