Adverse Selection in Carbon Offset Markets: Evidence from the Clean Development Mechanism in China

Carbon offsets could reduce the global costs of carbon abatement but there is little evidence on how much they truly reduce emissions. We study carbon offsets sold by firms under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) in China by matching offset projects proposed to the United Nations to panel data on emissions and output for manufacturing firms. We have two main findings. First, the CDM attempts to screen out projects that would be profitable without offset payments by rejecting proposed projects with higher stated returns. Second, offset-selling firms steeply increase emissions after registering an offset project, relative to similar firms that proposed a project but did not follow-through. We explain this increase in emissions by jointly modeling the firm decision to propose an offset project and the Board’s decision of whether to approve. In the model, CDM firms increase emissions due to a combination of the selection of higher-growth firms into abatement project investment and the causal effect of higher productivity, post investment, on firm scale and therefore emissions.

Publication Details

Journal
Stanford Digital Repository
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25740/pg478qv4230
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adverse Selection in Carbon Offset Markets: Evidence from the Clean Development Mechanism in China

Stanford Digital Repository
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
article

Adverse Selection in Carbon Offset Markets: Evidence from the Clean Development Mechanism in China

article en

Abstract

Carbon offsets could reduce the global costs of carbon abatement but there is little evidence on how much they truly reduce emissions. We study carbon offsets sold by firms under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) in China by matching offset projects proposed to the United Nations to panel data on emissions and output for manufacturing firms. We have two main findings. First, the CDM attempts to screen out projects that would be profitable without offset payments by rejecting proposed projects with higher stated returns. Second, offset-selling firms steeply increase emissions after registering an offset project, relative to similar firms that proposed a project but did not follow-through. We explain this increase in emissions by jointly modeling the firm decision to propose an offset project and the Board’s decision of whether to approve. In the model, CDM firms increase emissions due to a combination of the selection of higher-growth firms into abatement project investment and the causal effect of higher productivity, post investment, on firm scale and therefore emissions.

Stanford Digital Repository
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Adverse Selection in Carbon Offset Markets: Evidence from the Clean Development Mechanism in China · Stanford Digital Repository (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS