Who Benefits from Neighborhood Revitalization?

We investigate how a large place-based policy, the HOPE VI Revitalization program, affected people and places. The program sought to benefit people living in high-poverty neighborhoods by transforming these places into mixed-income communities through the demolition of public housing projects and the construction of new housing. We find that the program led to a large decline in neighborhood poverty rates, driven by changes in who moved into the neighborhood after a Revitalization award. Within five years of an award most original residents had moved away and were not exposed to the changed neighborhoods. The program reduced the number of subsidized renters in targeted neighborhoods, but those able to find a unit after an award lived in lower poverty neighborhoods. We find no evidence to suggest that the program had large spillover effects on the poverty rates of other neighborhoods.

Publication Details

Journal
Stanford Digital Repository
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25740/sv753vx0731
Primary Topic
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Benefits from Neighborhood Revitalization?

Stanford Digital Repository
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
article

Who Benefits from Neighborhood Revitalization?

article en

Abstract

We investigate how a large place-based policy, the HOPE VI Revitalization program, affected people and places. The program sought to benefit people living in high-poverty neighborhoods by transforming these places into mixed-income communities through the demolition of public housing projects and the construction of new housing. We find that the program led to a large decline in neighborhood poverty rates, driven by changes in who moved into the neighborhood after a Revitalization award. Within five years of an award most original residents had moved away and were not exposed to the changed neighborhoods. The program reduced the number of subsidized renters in targeted neighborhoods, but those able to find a unit after an award lived in lower poverty neighborhoods. We find no evidence to suggest that the program had large spillover effects on the poverty rates of other neighborhoods.

Stanford Digital Repository
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.