Seizing Social Media Accounts Based on Indonesia and the Netherlands Comparative Criminal Procedure Law

Investigators to prove the existence of a crime using social media as an intermediary, need to seize objects in the context of cybercrime, which are devices containing social media accounts. Seizure of objects related to criminal acts is regulated in the Code of Criminal Procedure. It becomes a problem whether social media can indeed be classified within the scope of the meaning of objects so that it can be seized. This research is conducted to determine whether social media accounts can be classified as objects under the Criminal Procedure Code regarding the seizure of objects that can be seized. The research methodology used to write this article employs a normative legal research methodology. The results of this study indicate that a person’s social media account cannot be seized because a social media account is not considered an object and does not fall into the classification of objects that can be subject to ownership rights. Seizure of social media accounts cannot be carried out either because it doesn’t meet the material requirements in the Criminal Procedure Code. Although social media accounts cannot be classified as objects, investigators can terminate access to the account belonging to the perpetrator with the owner.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v16i1.15376
Primary Topic
Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seizing Social Media Accounts Based on Indonesia and the Netherlands Comparative Criminal Procedure Law

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research
article

Seizing Social Media Accounts Based on Indonesia and the Netherlands Comparative Criminal Procedure Law

article en

Abstract

Investigators to prove the existence of a crime using social media as an intermediary, need to seize objects in the context of cybercrime, which are devices containing social media accounts. Seizure of objects related to criminal acts is regulated in the Code of Criminal Procedure. It becomes a problem whether social media can indeed be classified within the scope of the meaning of objects so that it can be seized. This research is conducted to determine whether social media accounts can be classified as objects under the Criminal Procedure Code regarding the seizure of objects that can be seized. The research methodology used to write this article employs a normative legal research methodology. The results of this study indicate that a person’s social media account cannot be seized because a social media account is not considered an object and does not fall into the classification of objects that can be subject to ownership rights. Seizure of social media accounts cannot be carried out either because it doesn’t meet the material requirements in the Criminal Procedure Code. Although social media accounts cannot be classified as objects, investigators can terminate access to the account belonging to the perpetrator with the owner.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Universitas Trunodjoyo Madura (ID), Universitas Merdeka Malang (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.